The Genesis and Evolution of Bylakuppe
The Genesis and Evolution of Bylakuppe: A Major Center for Exiled
Tibetans in India
1. Executive Summary
Bylakuppe, a region in
Karnataka, India, has emerged as the largest Tibetan settlement outside of
Tibet, a testament to the resilience and determination of the Tibetan people in
exile. Its establishment began in 1961 as Lugsung Samdupling, following the mass
exodus of Tibetans in 1959 after the Chinese invasion and the Dalai Lama's
flight to India. The Indian government, under Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru,
played a foundational role by granting asylum and allocating vast tracts of
forest land in Karnataka for rehabilitation.
The development of Bylakuppe
was marked by formidable initial challenges, including a dramatic climate
shift, the arduous task of clearing dense jungle, and the prevalence of
disease. Despite these adversities, the collective effort and spiritual motivation
of the Tibetan settlers enabled them to transform the challenging environment
into a thriving community. Over decades, Bylakuppe evolved through the
establishment of major monasteries—such as Namdroling, Sera, Tashi Lhunpo, and
Sakya—which became vital centers for religious education, cultural
preservation, and community cohesion. Concurrently, a robust educational
infrastructure, including Central Tibetan School Administration (CTSA) schools
and the Tibetan Children's Villages (TCV), was developed to ensure cultural
continuity for younger generations.
Economically, the settlement
transitioned from initial reliance on road construction and subsistence
agriculture to a diversified economy encompassing handicrafts, sweater selling,
and small businesses, supported by cooperative societies and modern agricultural
initiatives. However, the community continues to face challenges, particularly
regarding youth unemployment and the limitations imposed by their legal status
in India, which restricts land ownership and access to certain economic
opportunities. Demographic shifts, including subsequent waves of migration and
internal social dynamics, have further shaped Bylakuppe's trajectory. The
Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) has been instrumental in managing the
settlements, acting as a quasi-state entity that provides essential services
and maintains the distinct Tibetan identity. Bylakuppe's journey underscores a
remarkable adaptive capacity, demonstrating how a community, through
self-organization and sustained cultural and religious focus, can build a vibrant
and significant center in exile.
2. Introduction: Bylakuppe
– A Sanctuary in Exile
2.1 Overview of
Bylakuppe's Significance as a Major Tibetan Settlement
Bylakuppe stands as a pivotal
hub for the Tibetan diaspora, recognized as one of India's oldest and largest
Tibetan settlements. Originally known as Lugsung Samdupling when it was
established in 1961, it has since grown to become the largest Tibetan settlement
globally outside of Tibet itself. Situated in the Mysore district of Karnataka
, Bylakuppe is home to tens of thousands of Tibetans. While a 1998 demographic
survey by the Central Tibetan Administration's Planning Commission estimated
the Tibetan population at 50,727 individuals , more recent estimates suggest a
total population of approximately 70,000 by 2021, encompassing both Tibetans
and other residents.
The region's unique cultural
landscape, characterized by fluttering prayer flags, the presence of
maroon-robed monks, and the aroma of Tibetan cuisine, has led to its
affectionate designation as "Little Tibet" or the "Tibet of
South India". This profound transformation of the Karnataka countryside
into what is often described as a "replica of Lhasa" signifies more
than a mere geographical shift; it represents the community's successful
re-creation and active preservation of Tibetan cultural and religious life
outside its original homeland. This re-establishment, achieved despite immense
challenges, is a core explanation for its emergence as a significant center.
The presence of all four major schools of Tibetan Buddhism and the community's
evident dedication to instilling Tibetan values in younger generations,
including those who have never seen Tibet , points to a deliberate and
successful strategy for cultural continuity. This goes beyond mere survival; it
illustrates a vibrant cultural flourishing that makes Bylakuppe a magnet for
Tibetans and a testament to their identity.
2.2 Context: The 1959
Tibetan Uprising and the Dalai Lama's Flight to India
The origins of the Tibetan
settlement at Bylakuppe are deeply intertwined with the tumultuous events of
1959. In that year, the 14th Dalai Lama, Tibet's spiritual and temporal leader,
fled his homeland following a failed uprising against Chinese rule, seeking
political asylum in India. This pivotal moment triggered a mass influx of
Tibetan refugees into India, with tens of thousands following their spiritual
leader across the Himalayas.
Under the leadership of
then-Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, India extended crucial asylum to the
Dalai Lama and his followers. This foundational support from the Indian
government was indispensable. The Dalai Lama subsequently established the
independent Tibetan government-in-exile, known as the Central Tibetan
Administration (CTA), initially in Mussoorie in April 1959, before relocating
to Dharamshala in May 1960. Dharamshala remains the spiritual and temporal seat
of the Tibetan people in exile, and India continues to host the largest number
of Tibetan exiles and serves as the seat of the CTA. The very existence and
initial scale of Bylakuppe are directly attributable to India's early
humanitarian response. The granting of asylum and the specific allocation of
land in Karnataka were indispensable first steps, highlighting a clear causal
relationship: the generous and crucial support from the Indian government in
the immediate aftermath of the 1959 exodus laid the essential groundwork. This
was not a passive acceptance but an active facilitation of rehabilitation
programs, which provided the initial physical and legal space for the
settlement to begin and subsequently grow into a significant center.
3. The Genesis of
Settlement: India's Humanitarian Response
3.1 India's Initial Asylum
Policy and the Role of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru
In the immediate aftermath of
the Tibetan exodus, the Indian government adopted a notably accommodating
stance towards the refugees. The first wave of Tibetans, those who arrived with
the Dalai Lama in 1959, were officially recognized as refugees and granted
legal asylum. This initial policy was characterized by significant privileges,
including the allotment of land and housing, a benefit explicitly noted as not
being extended to other foreign nationals.
Prime Minister Jawaharlal
Nehru played a central role in this humanitarian effort, actively urging
various state governments across India to allocate land for the rehabilitation
of the refugees. This early policy was described as "quite generous"
and was instrumental in positioning the Tibetan issue as a significant
component of India's domestic and foreign policy. This strategic alignment
helped garner crucial domestic support for allocating valuable, then-scarce
resources to the newly arrived Tibetan community.
3.2 The Allocation of Land
in Karnataka and the Establishment of Lugsum Samdupling (1961) and Dickey
Larsoe (1969)
Responding to the central
government's directive, the government of Mysore, now known as Karnataka,
allotted a substantial tract of land in Bylakuppe for the Tibetan exiles. While
sources vary slightly on the exact acreage, figures range from nearly 3,000
acres (12 km2) to over 3,200 acres or even 6,142.25 hectares. This land
allocation was the cornerstone for the establishment of Lugsum Samdupling in
1961, which became the inaugural Tibetan exile settlement in India. Lugsum
Samdupling was recognized as the earliest and a major one among six
resettlement projects undertaken in Karnataka.
In the early 1960s,
approximately 3,000 Tibetan refugees were initially granted asylum in
Bylakuppe. For administrative convenience, this Old Settlement area was divided
into 7 camps. A second significant settlement, the Tibetan Dickey Larsoe
Settlement, was subsequently established nearby in 1969. The majority of its
villages, 14 out of 16, are located within Bylakuppe, with the remaining two in
Chowkur. The land provided for these settlements was predominantly forest land,
necessitating immense effort from the refugees to clear and convert it into
habitable and arable areas.
3.3 Initial Challenges
Faced by Settlers: Climate, Jungle Clearing, Disease, and Cultural Adaptation
The transition to their new
home in Karnataka presented the early Tibetan refugees with a dramatic cultural
and environmental shock. The thick jungles and verdant paddy fields of
Karnataka were starkly different from the mountainous gorges and high plateaus
of Tibet. Upon arrival, settlers found themselves on "empty land"
where they had to contend with unfamiliar wildlife, including elephants.
The first decade of exile
proved to be particularly harsh, marked by significant adversities. Refugees
suffered from the unfamiliar heat and tropical diseases, such as tuberculosis,
which they had never encountered in their native climate. Overcrowding, malnutrition,
and unsanitary conditions further contributed to widespread illness and death,
particularly among children. A monumental task involved clearing "vast
swaths of jungle" to create arable land, often with "little modern
equipment". For instance, elderly monks from Sera Jey Monastery, who
arrived in 1974, spent approximately three years clearing dense jungle amidst
snakes, tigers, and wild elephants, all while battling malnourishment and
disease. The cultural adjustment was profound, with local customs initially
perceived as "outlandish" by the newcomers.
While India's initial policy
was indeed generous in granting asylum and land, the detailed accounts of the
early settlement reveal profound hardships and adversities. The very nature of
the land allocated—forest land in a tropical climate—directly imposed severe
environmental and health challenges that were alien to the Tibetan refugees.
This highlights a critical nuance: asylum provided the space, but the process
of rehabilitation demanded immense resilience and self-reliance from the
refugees themselves. The success of Bylakuppe is thus a testament not only to
Indian aid but also to the extraordinary resilience and grit of the Tibetan
people in overcoming these formidable initial conditions. The successful
conversion of these challenging landscapes into productive land and settlements
with limited modern equipment was a Herculean task. The repeated emphasis on
"sheer grit and determination" and "incredible efforts" ,
coupled with specific mentions of monks clearing land and the inspiration drawn
from the Dalai Lama , points to a powerful underlying factor. This was not
merely individual labor but a collective endeavor, deeply motivated by a strong
sense of community, shared purpose, and spiritual conviction. This profound
social cohesion and spiritual drive were instrumental in enabling the refugees
to not only survive but also to actively develop the settlement, transforming a
challenging environment into a viable living space, thus contributing
significantly to Bylakuppe becoming a major center.
Table 1: Key Milestones in
Bylakuppe's Establishment and Development
Event |
Date |
Key
Source(s) |
Dalai
Lama flees to India, triggering mass Tibetan exodus |
1959 |
|
Lugsum
Samdupling (Old Settlement) established, first major Tibetan settlement in
India |
1961 |
|
Namdroling
Monastery (Golden Temple) established by Pema Norbu Rinpoche |
1961
(Monastery foundation); 1969 (Golden Temple structure) |
|
Indian
government ceases to legally recognize new Tibetan arrivals as refugees |
1963 |
|
Dickey
Larsoe (New Settlement) established |
1969 |
|
Sera
Theckchenling Monastery re-established in Bylakuppe |
1969 |
|
UNHCR
closes its New Delhi office and discontinues aid to Tibetan refugees in India |
1975 |
|
Karnataka
implements new Tibetan Rehabilitation Policy, allowing land leasing in
refugees' names |
2014 |
|
4. Evolving Policies and
Refugee Rights
4.1 The Indian
Government's Changing Stance on Tibetan Refugees (Pre-1970s vs. Post-1970s)
In its initial phase, from
1959 through the 1970s, India's policy towards Tibetan refugees was notably
accommodating. The first wave of arrivals, those accompanying the Dalai Lama in
1959, were granted legal asylum and the significant privilege of land and
housing. These early refugees were also automatically issued Registration
Certificates (RCs), which served as crucial identity documents, enabling them
to legally travel and work within India. Furthermore, the United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) maintained a temporary presence in India
during this period, providing services to Tibetans who arrived between 1959 and
the 1970s.
However, India's policy began
to shift over time, a change arguably influenced by a desire to preserve
Sino-Indian relations. A significant alteration occurred in 1963, when the
Indian government ceased to legally recognize newly arriving Tibetans as refugees.
Consequently, Tibetans arriving after 1979, and some from as early as the late
1960s, faced considerably greater difficulty in acquiring RCs. The process for
obtaining an RC became arduous, yet the document remained indispensable for
employment, residency rights, and international travel. Adding to these
challenges, the UNHCR closed its New Delhi office and discontinued its aid to
Tibetan refugees in 1975.
4.2 Impact on Legal
Status, Land Tenure, and Access to Services (RCs, Land Ownership Restrictions)
These policy changes had
direct and severe consequences for later arrivals. Unlike the initial wave,
newer refugees were not fortunate enough to receive land from the government.
This posed a significant problem, as farming is a primary source of income for
Tibetans, and Indian law generally prohibits foreigners from purchasing land.
Even for Tibetans holding
RCs, fundamental rights enjoyed by Indian citizens remain out of reach. They
cannot gain Indian citizenship, which means they are unable to vote, work for
local or federal governments, carry an Indian passport, or legally purchase
land. While RCs permit legal work in pre-approved economic sectors,
discrimination against Tibetans by employers in favor of Indian nationals has
been reported.
A notable positive
development occurred with the implementation of the Tibetan Rehabilitation
Policy (TRP) in 2014 by the Karnataka government. This policy allowed Tibetan
refugees to lease land in their own names, a crucial change from the previous
situation where the legal status of allotted land remained 'forest' in records,
hindering individual farmers from obtaining Rights Tenancy and Crops (RTC)
records. The new policy enables the issuance of RTCs, granting access to vital
agricultural benefits such as crop loans, incentives on equipment, and farm
loans. However, this land is leased to the Central Tibetan Relief Committee
(CTRC) and then sub-allotted to individuals, and its legal status as 'forest'
is maintained. Furthermore, Tibetans are prohibited from transferring,
mortgaging, or pledging these leased lands.
The evolution of India's
refugee policy from initial benevolence to increased restrictions has created a
profound and enduring impact, leading to a stratified refugee community. The
policy change in 1963, ceasing to legally recognize new refugees, directly
resulted in a disparity of rights and services based on arrival date. This
created an unstable refugee policy and a de facto two-tiered system where
"first-wave" Tibetans (pre-1979) generally enjoy more privileges,
such as easier RC acquisition and initial land allocation, than
"newcomers" (post-1979/1990s). This has led to the emergence of
internal social tensions, such as the discrimination faced by
"Sanjor" (newcomers) , which complicates community cohesion and the
pursuit of collective self-sufficiency. While the 2014 land leasing policy in
Karnataka represents a positive adaptation, it underscores the ongoing need for
policy adjustments to address the complex realities of a long-term stateless
population and mitigate these internal divisions.
4.3 The Role of the
Central Tibetan Administration (CTA) in Managing Settlements
The Central Tibetan
Administration (CTA), formerly known as the Tibetan Government in Exile, is
headquartered in Dharamshala and serves as the primary leadership body for the
Tibetan people in exile. It functions as a comprehensive network of Tibetan-run
agencies, effectively operating as a government-of-Tibet-in-exile. Key
departments of the CTA are legally recognized as registered societies under
India's Societies Registration Act, allowing them to operate as
non-governmental organizations within India.
The CTA has played an
increasingly critical role in supporting refugees, particularly newer arrivals,
stepping in where the Indian government's assistance waned and after the
UNHCR's withdrawal. Each Tibetan refugee settlement in India, including those in
Bylakuppe, is overseen by a settlement officer appointed by the CTA. While the
Indian government retains ultimate authority, especially in criminal matters,
Tibetan administrators are generally given a significant degree of autonomy in
managing the day-to-day affairs of the settlements and actively work to
maintain positive relations with local Indian communities. The CTA also manages
the Central Tibetan School Administration (CTSA), a vital organization
established to manage and support schools for Tibetan children, ensuring the
preservation of their culture and heritage.
The Central Tibetan
Administration's role transcends that of a typical non-governmental
organization; it functions effectively as a quasi-state actor in exile. This is
a crucial aspect of Bylakuppe's development into a significant center. While
the Indian government provided the initial physical space, the CTA has been the
primary architect and provider of administrative, social, and cultural
infrastructure, including schools, healthcare, welfare, and day-to-day
management. This unique arrangement means that Bylakuppe's growth and sustained
vibrancy are not solely dependent on the host government's policies, but
significantly on the robust self-governance and organizational capacity of the
Tibetan exile community itself. The CTA's ability to shoulder the burden of
providing for these refugees and its legal recognition as registered societies
are key factors in the settlements' long-term viability and their success in
maintaining a distinct Tibetan identity despite statelessness.
Table 2: Bylakuppe
Population Estimates Over Time
Year/Period |
Population
Estimate |
Key
Source(s) |
Early
1960s (Initial refugees granted asylum) |
~3,000 |
|
1969
(Initial settlers in Dickey Larsoe) |
~2,000 |
|
1998
(Tibetan population in Bylakuppe) |
50,727 |
|
2009
(Citizens in Bylakuppe) |
10,000 |
|
2021
(Estimated total population, including Tibetans) |
70,000 |
|
2023
(Total Tibetan refugees in Karnataka) |
~21,300 |
|
5. Building a Cultural and
Religious Heartland
5.1 The Establishment and
Growth of Major Monasteries (Namdroling, Sera, Tashi Lhunpo, Sakya)
Bylakuppe has evolved into a
unique and vibrant hub, hosting monasteries that represent all four major
schools of Tibetan Buddhism: Nyingmapa, Kagyudpa, Sakya, and Gelugpa. This
comprehensive representation is a primary factor in its status as a significant
religious center.
Namdroling Monastery
(Golden Temple): A cornerstone of Bylakuppe, this monastery was established
in 1961 by Pema Norbu Rinpoche. While some sources indicate 1963 for its
establishment , and one outlier mentions 1999 , the consensus points to its
early founding. It was consecrated and named by the Dalai Lama. Namdroling is
widely regarded as the largest teaching center of the Nyingmapa lineage of
Tibetan Buddhism in the world. It houses a vast monastic community, with over
4,000 monks studying there , and later figures indicating over 9,000 registered
monks and nuns, with more than 3,500 actively engaged in studies, receiving
free food, clothing, accommodation, and teachings. The iconic Golden Temple
structure itself was completed by 1969.
Sera Theckchenling
Monastery: Re-established in Bylakuppe in 1969, this institution comprises
Sera Je Dratsang and Sera Mey Dratsang. This marked a continuation of the
famous monastic university in Lhasa, which was damaged during the 1959 revolts,
prompting its monks to flee to India. In 1974, the Karnataka state government
allocated 200 acres of land to 200 elderly monks from Sera Jey Monastery. The
monastery experienced significant growth, with its monk population increasing
from 200 in 1974 to 800 by 1985, 1,900 by 1991, and reaching 3,200 by 2000.
Sera belongs to the Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism.
Tashi Lhunpo Monastery:
A relatively newer addition to Bylakuppe, its name references the historic
15th-century Tashi Lhunpo monastery in Shigatse, Tibet.
Sakya Monastery: A
smaller sister monastery of the Sakya tradition also opened in Bylakuppe, with
the main new Sakya monastery re-established in Dehra Dun.
5.2 Monasteries as Centers
for Religious Education, Cultural Preservation, and Community Cohesion
The monasteries in Bylakuppe
are not merely places of worship; they serve as central pillars of the Tibetan
way of life. They function as major learning centers for Tibetan Buddhism ,
actively preserving traditional Tibetan Buddhist traditions and culture in
exile. They provide comprehensive support, including education, accommodation,
and food, for thousands of monks and nuns. For instance, Sera Jey offers a
rigorous 15-to-20-year program leading to the prestigious Geshe degree.
Beyond their religious and
educational roles, these monasteries significantly contribute to the welfare
and social fabric of the broader community. Sera Jey and Sera Mey Monasteries,
for example, have provided relief money and essential medical kits to needy
Tibetans in the Lugsam and Delar settlements, and have even extended assistance
to local needy Indians. They also create employment opportunities, such as
kitchen staff positions. The presence of these impressive monasteries also acts
as a significant draw for tourists, which in turn contributes to the local
economy through increased visitor spending.
The sheer scale and
multi-functional nature of the monasteries are a direct and primary explanation
for Bylakuppe's emergence as a major center. The growth of institutions like
Namdroling, with over 9,000 registered monks and nuns, and Sera, reaching 3,200
monks by 2000, transformed the settlement from a mere refugee camp into a
vibrant, self-sustaining cultural and religious metropolis. This establishes a
clear causal relationship: the establishment and subsequent expansion of these
monastic centers, which provide not only spiritual guidance but also education,
housing, healthcare, and welfare , acted as a powerful magnet, attracting more
Tibetans and even tourists. This comprehensive institutional infrastructure,
extending beyond purely religious aspects, is critical to Bylakuppe's
development and its ability to maintain a distinct identity.
5.3 The Development of
Educational Institutions (CTSA Schools, Dalai Lama Institute for Higher
Education, TCV)
A cornerstone of India's
support system for Tibetan refugees has been its commitment to education and
cultural preservation. The Indian government, in close collaboration with
Tibetan authorities, took significant steps to establish educational institutions
that provide a comprehensive curriculum, encompassing both modern sciences and
traditional Tibetan culture and language.
The Central Tibetan School
Administration (CTSA), an autonomous organization established in 1961, plays a
crucial role in managing and assisting schools across India for Tibetan
children, with the explicit objective of preserving and promoting their unique
culture and heritage. As of 2009, CTSA was operating 71 schools, enrolling
approximately 10,000 students.
Further expanding educational
opportunities, the Tibetan Children's Villages (TCV) established the first
Tibetan higher college in exile, "The Dalai Lama Institute for Higher
Education," in Bangalore in 2009. This institution focuses on teaching
Tibetan language and culture, alongside science, arts, counseling, and
information technology. TCV also has a presence in Bylakuppe itself, offering
day-care, primary and secondary education, and medical treatment, and providing
family-like homes for children who have lost parental care.
Monastic institutions also
developed their own educational arms. Sera Jey, for instance, established a
school in 1984, which achieved a historic milestone in 1998 by receiving
affiliation status from India's Central Board of Secondary Education—the first
time a school within a monastic system was granted such recognition.
The consistent emphasis on
establishing robust and comprehensive educational systems—from the Central
Tibetan School Administration (CTSA) to monastic schools and the Tibetan
Children's Villages (TCV)—reveals a deliberate, long-term strategic investment in
cultural preservation and community survival. This demonstrates that the
Tibetan leadership understood that merely providing shelter was insufficient;
active mechanisms were needed to transmit language, values, and identity to
subsequent generations, especially those born in exile who "have never
seen their homeland". The fact that poor educational opportunities in
Tibet were a significant "pull factor" for youth migration to India
further underscores the critical importance of these educational institutions
in India. However, the challenges faced by youth without Indian citizenship in
accessing higher education highlight a persistent barrier to ensuring future
opportunities and preventing potential cultural dilution , indicating that this
strategy requires ongoing adaptation.
Table 3: Major Monasteries
and Their Founding Dates in Bylakuppe
Monastery |
Tradition |
Founding
Date |
Significance |
Key
Source(s) |
Namdroling
Monastery (Golden Temple) |
Nyingmapa |
1961
(Monastery); 1969 (Golden Temple) |
World's
largest Nyingmapa teaching center; houses thousands of monks/nuns; major
tourist attraction. |
|
Sera
Theckchenling Monastery (Sera Je & Sera Mey) |
Gelugpa |
1969
(re-established) |
Major
monastic university; significant monk population; established an affiliated
school. |
|
Tashi
Lhunpo Monastery |
Gelugpa |
Relatively
new |
Sister
monastery to the historical Tashi Lhunpo in Tibet. |
|
Sakya
Monastery |
Sakya |
(Specific
date not provided) |
Represents
one of the four major Tibetan Buddhist schools; sister monastery to main new
Sakya monastery. |
|
6. Economic Development
and Self-Sufficiency
6.1 Transition from
Initial Road Construction and Subsistence Agriculture
In the early days of exile,
many Tibetans were initially employed in road construction projects in India's
hilly regions. Gradually, as settlements like Bylakuppe were established, they
were rehabilitated into agricultural roles. Agriculture quickly became the
primary source of livelihood, with Tibetans being trained to cultivate local
Indian crops such as maize, millet, rice, and mustard. Most of the original
families in settlements like Lugsum Samdupling were allotted a small piece of
agricultural land.
However, reliance on rain-fed
agriculture due to a lack of irrigation facilities meant that farming alone was
often "not sufficient to sustain the families". This inherent
limitation spurred the community to diversify its economic activities, recognizing
the need for more robust and varied income streams.
6.2 Diversification into
Handicrafts, Sweater Selling, and Small Businesses
A significant economic
adaptation for the Tibetan diaspora was their entry into the winter garment
trade. Tibetans began selling sweaters in towns and cities across India, an
activity that has since become a "dominant economic activity" for the
diaspora. The local economy in Bylakuppe today is largely sustained by a
combination of farming, sweater selling, and handicrafts. Settlers have also
ventured into trading, operating restaurants, and running small shops.
The Indian government played
a facilitating role by encouraging Tibetans to engage in agriculture,
handicrafts, and small businesses through various livelihood programs. The
Tibetan diaspora itself has been proactive in establishing cooperatives and
enterprises, contributing to their communities and fostering a degree of
self-sustainability. Overall, the economic conditions of Tibetan refugees have
"significantly improved" over the last few decades.
6.3 The Role of
Cooperative Societies and Modern Agricultural Initiatives
Community-led economic
structures emerged early on, demonstrating the self-organizing capacity of the
Tibetan community. The settlers themselves initiated a Co-operative Society in
1961, which was formally registered in 1964 under the Indian Co-operative
Society Act, primarily to manage the settlement's trading activities. The
presence of farm cooperatives is a visible feature along the road to Bylakuppe.
The Agriculture Division of
the Central Tibetan Relief Committee (CTRC) has been instrumental in making
Tibetan settlements sustainable and improving farmers' livelihoods. This
includes implementing modern agricultural initiatives:
- High-Value Central Tibetan Exotic Citrus Nursery:
Established at ORTC Bylakuppe, this project aims to develop large-scale,
high-density modern plantations. It focuses on supplying high-quality
seedlings grafted onto local hardy rootstocks, with a projected capacity
of 12,000 plants in the first year, expanding to 48,000 by year three, and
also envisages marketing seedlings as a revenue stream.
- ICT-based Farm Extension System (PADMA App):
This technology-based application is designed specifically for Tibetan
farmers, providing timely and relevant extension services. It helps
farmers make critical decisions, increase profitability, and obtain expert
advice on issues like crop care and agronomy, leveraging a detailed
computerized farmer database.
- Large-scale Jatropha Plantation & Oil
Extraction Project: Located in Hunsur, a southern settlement, this
project aims to convert largely abandoned farmlands (due to chronic
elephant menace) into irrigated Jatropha plantations. Jatropha is
resistant to elephants, and the project includes an oil extraction plant,
utilizing hybrid seedlings and high-yield clones.
Bylakuppe's economic
trajectory from initial reliance on road construction and limited rain-fed
agriculture to a diversified economy encompassing sweater selling, handicrafts,
and various small businesses demonstrates a remarkable adaptive resilience. The
establishment of cooperative societies and the implementation of modern
agricultural initiatives signify proactive efforts towards self-sufficiency.
This is a clear causal chain: the limitations of initial agricultural practices
spurred diversification, which was then supported by community organizations
and external aid, leading to a "significant improvement" in economic
conditions.
6.4 Challenges of
Unemployment and Economic Integration for Newer Generations
Despite the overall economic
progress, significant challenges persist, particularly concerning the growing
unemployment among Tibetan youth, with a reported rate as high as 75%. There is
a noticeable shift in aspirations among younger generations (aged 16-25), with
most expressing a preference for the business sector over agriculture. This is
driven by the perception that agriculture yields less income and is more
time-consuming , indicating a potential future decline in farming as a primary
occupation.
The migration of young
Tibetans from settlements to Indian cities due to a lack of local employment
opportunities is a "serious cause of concern," threatening the
preservation of Tibetan identity and culture in exile. Some established schools
in the settlements are reportedly on the verge of closure due to a lack of
pupils. Furthermore, Tibetans without Indian citizenship face significant
hurdles in pursuing higher education, often required to pay foreign student
rates at Indian institutions. This limits their employment prospects and
frequently forces them into the informal sector. The fact that the amount of
available land has "essentially stayed the same" while the population
has increased exacerbates unemployment and contributes to a growing number of
destitute families.
A crucial implication is that
this economic evolution has generated its own set of challenges, most notably
growing unemployment among the Tibetan youth and their decreasing interest in
traditional agriculture. This tension between economic opportunity and cultural
preservation, manifested in youth migration out of settlements, poses a
significant threat to the long-term sustainability and cultural cohesion of
Bylakuppe as a vibrant center. The persistent lack of Indian citizenship and
the inability to legally own land directly constrain the economic opportunities
available to Tibetans in Bylakuppe, particularly for newer arrivals and younger
generations. This establishes a clear causal relationship: the legal
restrictions imposed by the host country significantly impede full economic
integration and self-sufficiency. While the 2014 land leasing policy was a
positive step, it grants only leasehold, not ownership, and comes with specific
limitations. Furthermore, the financial burden of foreign student rates for
higher education exacerbates youth unemployment and pushes them into the
informal sector. This implies that despite the community's internal efforts
towards self-sufficiency, external legal and policy frameworks continue to act
as significant structural barriers to long-term economic stability,
contributing to the out-migration of Tibetans to other countries in search of
better prospects.
7. Demographic Shifts and
Social Dynamics
7.1 Waves of Tibetan
Migration to India and Bylakuppe (1959, 1980s-90s, Post-2000s)
Tibetan emigration to India
has occurred in distinct waves, each contributing to the demographic
composition of settlements like Bylakuppe.
First Wave (1950s-1960s):
The initial exodus began with Tibetans escaping Kham in the early and
mid-1950s. The most significant influx occurred from 1959 to 1960, when
approximately 80,000 Tibetans followed the Dalai Lama across the Himalayas to
India. Subsequent, continuous flights, estimated at 1,000 to 2,500 people per
year, further swelled these numbers to 100,000. This initial movement was
sometimes referred to as an "exodus," as noted in a 1961 United
Nations General Assembly resolution.
Second Wave (1986-1996):
Following the opening of Tibet to trade and tourism in the 1980s, a
"second exodus" took place, driven by increasing political
repression. During this decade, an estimated 25,000 Tibetans arrived in India
and Nepal, seeking to escape religious oppression, reunite with families, or
pursue better employment and educational opportunities. This wave significantly
increased the exiled community in India by 18%.
Third Wave (Post-1990s /
Sanjorwa Era): A substantial number of refugees continued to arrive in
India in the 1990s, after a relative hiatus since 1979. From the late 1990s
until 2008, an estimated 2,000 to 3,000 Tibetans annually made the journey to
India, primarily transiting through Nepal. A notable characteristic of this
wave was that most new immigrants were children sent to attend Tibetan cultural
schools. However, since 2008, the instances of Tibetans escaping into exile
have become infrequent due to intensified Chinese surveillance and repression.
7.2 Population Growth and
Current Demographics of Bylakuppe
Bylakuppe's population has
seen substantial growth since its inception. From an initial figure of around
3,000 refugees in the early 1960s , it grew to an estimated 70,000 people
(including Tibetans) by 2021. A demographic survey conducted by the Central
Tibetan Administration's Planning Commission in 1998 specifically accounted for
50,727 Tibetans within Bylakuppe. Karnataka, the state where Bylakuppe is
located, is currently home to the largest number of Tibetan refugees in India,
with approximately 21,300 individuals as of 2023.
Despite Bylakuppe's growth,
the overall Tibetan population in India has experienced a decline in recent
years, decreasing from approximately 123,000 in 2007 to 102,000 in 2022. This
downward trend is attributed to several factors, including stringent border
controls imposed by China, increased migration of Tibetans to Western
countries, and declining birth rates within the diaspora. The total number of
Tibetan diaspora members in India reportedly declined from 150,000 in 2011 to
85,000 in 2019.
7.3 Internal Social
Dynamics within the Diaspora (e.g., "Sanjor" Newcomers)
The multi-generational nature
of the Tibetan diaspora has led to significant cultural gaps and internal
social dynamics. A "prejudicial attitude" exists against recent
Tibetan emigrants, often referred to as 'Sanjor' (newcomers), by the more settled
Tibetans. These newcomers, particularly those arriving post-1990s, sometimes
face social discrimination within Tibetan settlements, and inter-marriages
between 'Sanjor' and established Tibetans are rare. There is also a strong
sense of tribalism among various émigré groups, which has, in some instances,
led to physical aggressions between monasteries in South India and first-wave
immigrants in the region.
This internal stratification
and tension are significant because they complicate community cohesion and the
collective pursuit of self-sufficiency. While the Dalai Lama encourages
learning multiple languages and adapting, the cultural differences, such as
'Sanjor' watching Chinese movies or speaking Mandarin, can create friction with
those who have maintained a more traditional exile identity. The former
president of the CTA, Lobsang Sangay, had pledged to foster unity between
'Sanjor' and 'Shichaks' (established settlers), but substantive conflict
resolution efforts had not yielded significant results as of 2013. These
internal divisions, alongside external pressures like language barriers,
difficulty adapting to new food, and the warm climate , contribute to the
challenges faced by newly migrating Tibetans in India and can influence their
decisions to seek opportunities elsewhere.
8. Conclusion
Bylakuppe's transformation
into a prominent center for exiled Tibetans is a multifaceted narrative rooted
in the 1959 Chinese invasion of Tibet and the subsequent flight of the Dalai
Lama. Its journey began in 1961 with the establishment of Lugsung Samdupling,
followed by Dickey Larsoe in 1969, a direct consequence of India's initial
humanitarian policy under Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, who generously
allocated forest land in Karnataka for Tibetan rehabilitation.
The initial phase was marked
by immense hardship, as early settlers confronted an alien tropical climate,
tropical diseases, and the daunting task of converting dense jungle into arable
land with minimal resources. Yet, it was the extraordinary resilience,
collective effort, and deep spiritual motivation of the Tibetan community that
enabled them to overcome these formidable challenges, laying the physical and
social foundations for the settlement.
A critical factor in
Bylakuppe's growth was the establishment and expansion of its monastic
institutions, notably Namdroling, Sera, Tashi Lhunpo, and Sakya monasteries.
These institutions transcended their religious functions to become
comprehensive centers for education, cultural preservation, and community
welfare, attracting thousands of monks, nuns, and lay practitioners.
Concurrently, a robust educational infrastructure, including CTSA schools and
TCV initiatives, was developed to ensure the transmission of Tibetan language,
culture, and identity to subsequent generations, many of whom have never seen
Tibet.
Economically, Bylakuppe
evolved from initial reliance on road construction and subsistence agriculture
to a diversified economy, with sweater selling, handicrafts, and small
businesses becoming significant income sources. The proactive role of
cooperative societies and the Central Tibetan Administration's agricultural
initiatives have been instrumental in fostering self-sufficiency. However, the
community continues to grapple with the complexities of its legal status in
India, which limits citizenship, land ownership, and certain employment
opportunities. These external policy constraints, coupled with internal social
dynamics between different waves of migrants and the challenge of youth
unemployment, contribute to ongoing out-migration, posing a long-term threat to
the settlement's demographic stability and cultural cohesion.
In essence, Bylakuppe became
a major center for exiled Tibetans through a unique confluence of factors: the
initial humanitarian embrace by India, the unparalleled resilience and adaptive
capacity of the Tibetan people, the strategic re-establishment of their core
cultural and religious institutions, and the robust self-governance provided by
the Central Tibetan Administration. It stands as a powerful symbol of a
stateless community's determination to preserve its identity and way of life
against profound adversity, continually adapting to new challenges while
maintaining a vibrant cultural heartland.
References
url:
https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/colours-tibet-bylakuppe-2183613
question: Bylakuppe Tibetan settlement history establishment date
url:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bylakuppe
question: Bylakuppe Tibetan settlement land area discrepancy
url:
https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/bylakuppe
question: Bylakuppe Tibetan Cooperative Society history activities
url:
https://www.backpackadventures.org/bylakuppe-karnataka/
question: impact of monasteries on Bylakuppe growth
url:
https://substack.com/home/post/p-149354538?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
question: Bylakuppe Tibetan settlement initial challenges early settlers
url:
https://footloosedev.com/bylakuppe-karnataka-making-kindness-familiar-to-the-world/
question: Detailed account of initial hardships and challenges faced by Tibetan
refugees in Bylakuppe, including climate, disease, and jungle clearing
url:
https://footloosedev.com/bylakuppe-karnataka-making-kindness-familiar-to-the-world/
question: Personal narratives or detailed historical accounts of the early days
of Bylakuppe settlement.
url:
https://www.tibetanrefugeehealth.org/the-role-of-india-in-supporting-tibetan-refugees/
question: role of Indian government in Tibetan settlements
url:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_Dalai_Lama
question: Dalai Lama arrival India Tibetan refugees
url:
https://digitalcommons.du.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1631&context=hrhw
question: How did the Indian government's policy towards Tibetan refugees
evolve, especially regarding land and rights, and its impact on settlements
like Bylakuppe?
url:
https://www.uscis.gov/archive/ric-query-india-30-may-2003
question: Tibetan refugees India settlement policy 1960s
url:
https://www.lunduniversity.lu.se/lup/publication/1320820
question: Dalai Lama arrival India Tibetan refugees
url:
https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/tibetan-refugees-india
question: Evolution of Bylakuppe from initial settlement to a self-sustaining
community, key milestones and phases.
url:
https://oxfordre.com/asianhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277727-e-828?d=%2F10.1093%2Facrefore%2F9780190277727.001.0001%2Facrefore-9780190277727-e-828&p=emailAiq5K7fEpULmM
question: role of Indian government in Tibetan settlements
url:
https://bangaloremirror.indiatimes.com/bangalore/others/karnataka-allow-tibetan-refugees-lease-land-own-names/articleshow/49651214.cms
question: Specifics of land acquisition and conversion of forest land for
Tibetan settlements in Karnataka, including legal aspects.
url:
https://lanthanbathery.wordpress.com/2019/09/09/bylakuppe-diaries-a-photologue/
question: Details about the establishment of Lugsum Samdupling and Dickey
Larsoe settlements in Bylakuppe, including land acquisition and initial
infrastructure.
url:
https://centraltibetanreliefcommittee.net/index.php/lugsung-samdupling-bkuppe/
question: Bylakuppe Tibetan settlement phases of development self-sufficiency
url:
https://ijcrt.org/papers/IJPUB1801221.pdf
question: Bylakuppe Tibetan settlement agriculture economic development
url:
https://www.shambhala.com/snowlion_articles/a-westerners-glance-inside-the-great-monastery-of-sera-jey-2/
question: social impact of Sera Monastery Bylakuppe
url:
https://www.onmanorama.com/travel/outside-kerala/2018/08/22/bylakuppe-tibetan-nation-that-grew-in-karnataka.html
question: Bylakuppe Tibetan Cooperative Society history activities
url:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibetan_diaspora
question: Bylakuppe Tibetan settlement initial challenges early settlers
url:
https://www.namdroling.net/
question: economic impact of Namdroling Monastery Bylakuppe
url:
https://tibet.net/sera-jey-and-sera-mey-monastery-contribute-to-needy-tibetans-in-bylakuppe/
question: social impact of Sera Monastery Bylakuppe
url:
https://www.sos-barnebyer.no/her-jobber-vi/asia/india/bylakuppe/
question: Bylakuppe Tibetan settlement phases of development self-sufficiency
url:
https://centraltibetanreliefcommittee.net/index.php/2024/06/10/south-central-section/
question: Bylakuppe Tibetan settlement agriculture economic development
Comments
Post a Comment