An Exploration of Indic and Chinese Civilizations and Their Impact on Asia

An Exploration of Indic and Chinese Civilizations and Their Impact on Asia

 

The Indic and Chinese civilizations, rooted in ancient agrarian societies, share philosophical depth and scholarly traditions but diverge in governance, religion, and cultural expression. Over 4,000 years and more, their interactions through trade, Buddhist transmission, and diplomacy shaped Asia, particularly Southeast Asia. This essay examines their commonalities, differences, pivotal meeting points, trade dynamics, and Indic dominance in ASEAN (except Vietnam and the Philippines), incorporating gender roles, ecological contexts, technological exchanges, artistic influences, and diasporic identities. It also analyzes Islam’s rise in Indonesia and Malaysia, emphasizing linguistic and ethnic dimensions. Supported by archaeological evidence, and inscriptions, it explores how maritime trade, adaptable religions, and migrations spread Indic culture, while Chinese influence dominated Vietnam. The syncretic cultural tapestry of ASEAN, blending Indic, Chinese, and Islamic elements, underscores Asia’s interconnected history, offering insights into its pluralistic heritage.

Common Elements Between Indic and Chinese Civilizations

The Indic and Chinese civilizations, emerging around 2000 BCE, share foundational traits that highlight their resilience and influence across Asia. Both were agrarian societies, relying on river systems—the Indus, Ganges, and Brahmaputra in India, and the Yellow and Yangtze in China—for agricultural surplus. This enabled urban centers like Mohenjo-Daro and Anyang, fostering advancements in architecture, governance, and art. “Riverine economies were the bedrock of both civilizations’ complexity,” notes historian Romila Thapar (Thapar, 2002, p. 45). Writing systems, such as India’s Brahmi script (evidenced in Ashokan edicts, c. 250 BCE) and China’s oracle bone script (Shang dynasty, c. 1200 BCE), preserved religious, administrative, and literary knowledge, as seen in the Rigveda and Shijing.

Philosophically, both civilizations emphasized ethics and the human condition. India’s Upanishads, Buddhism, and Jainism explored metaphysical liberation, while China’s Confucianism, Daoism, and Legalism focused on social harmony and cosmic balance. “Both traditions sought wisdom, but India prioritized transcendence, China practicality,” observes sinologist Joseph Needham (Needham, 1956, p. 87). Educational institutions, such as India’s Nalanda and Takshashila universities and China’s Hanlin Academy, attracted scholars across Asia, fostering cross-cultural exchange. “These centers were crucibles of intellectual synthesis,” says historian Upinder Singh (Singh, 2008, p. 312).

Linguistically, India’s Indo-Aryan and Dravidian languages and China’s Sino-Tibetan languages developed rich literary traditions. “Oral and written traditions ensured cultural continuity,” notes linguist David Crystal (Crystal, 2005, p. 112). Ethnic migrations, though limited, occurred via trade routes, with Indian merchants settling in Chinese ports like Quanzhou by the 7th century and Chinese traders in South Indian ports like Mamallapuram. “These diasporas laid early seeds of cultural fusion,” says historian Sanjay Subrahmanyam (Subrahmanyam, 1997, p. 203).

Gender roles also shared similarities. Both societies valued family structures, with women playing roles in religious and economic spheres, though often subordinated. In India, women like Gargi in Vedic texts contributed to philosophical debates, while in China, women like Ban Zhao authored Confucian texts. “Gender roles, though patriarchal, allowed women limited agency in both cultures,” notes historian Barbara Andaya (Andaya, 2006, p. 112). Ecologically, both civilizations managed water resources for agriculture, with India’s Harappan irrigation systems and China’s Grand Canal reflecting environmental adaptation. “Environmental mastery shaped their cultural landscapes,” says archaeologist Himanshu Prabha Ray (Ray, 2003, p. 67).

Differentiating Factors

Despite shared traits, Indic and Chinese civilizations diverged significantly. India’s religious landscape was pluralistic, embracing Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and later Sikhism, with a cyclical view of time and emphasis on moksha (liberation). “Indian thought celebrated diverse paths to salvation,” writes philosopher Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (Radhakrishnan, 1957, p. 23). China’s philosophies—Confucianism, Daoism, and Legalism—were secular, focusing on social order and natural harmony. “Confucianism’s hierarchical ethos shaped China’s state-centric worldview,” notes historian John Fairbank (Fairbank, 1992, p. 56).

Governance structures differed markedly. China’s centralized bureaucracy, from the Qin (221 BCE) to the Qing (1644–1912), relied on meritocratic examinations. “China’s imperial unity was unmatched in early history,” says historian Patricia Ebrey (Ebrey, 2010, p. 89). India, by contrast, was politically fragmented, with dynasties like the Mauryas and Guptas unifying regions culturally through Sanskrit texts and Vedic rituals. The caste system, absent in China, structured Indian society. “Caste created a unique social rigidity,” observes sociologist Max Weber (Weber, 1958, p. 131).

Culturally, Indian epics like the Mahabharata and Ramayana wove mythology and spirituality, while Chinese literature, like Sima Qian’s Shiji, prioritized historical accuracy. “Indian narratives were cosmic; Chinese were grounded in history,” says literary scholar Stephen Owen (Owen, 1996, p. 45). Technologically, China led with gunpowder, the compass, and printing, driven by state needs, while India’s contributions, like the concept of zero and Ayurveda, stemmed from philosophical inquiry. “India’s mathematical legacy reshaped global science,” notes mathematician George Gheverghese Joseph (Joseph, 1991, p. 217).

Linguistically, India’s diverse Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, and Austroasiatic languages contrasted with China’s tonal Sino-Tibetan languages, limiting mutual intelligibility. Ethnically, India’s mix of Indo-Aryans, Dravidians, and tribal groups differed from China’s Han-dominated homogeneity, though minorities like the Uyghurs existed. “India’s linguistic pluralism fostered cultural diversity, unlike China’s unification,” says linguist Bernard Comrie (Comrie, 2003, p. 78).

Gender dynamics also diverged. Indian women had roles in religious rituals, as seen in Vedic hymns, but were constrained by caste norms. Chinese women faced stricter Confucian patriarchy, though figures like Empress Wu Zetian wielded power. “Gender roles in China were more rigidly patriarchal than in India,” notes Andaya (Andaya, 2006, p. 134). Ecologically, India’s monsoon-dependent agriculture contrasted with China’s river-regulated systems, influencing their cultural expressions, such as India’s rain-centric festivals versus China’s harvest rituals.

Pivotal Meeting Points Over 4,000 Years

Sino-Indian interactions over 4,000 years were shaped by trade, religion, diplomacy, and migration, with Buddhism as the central conduit:

1. Prehistoric and Early Contacts (2000 BCE–200 CE): Indirect trade via Central Asian intermediaries linked the Indus Valley and Shang China. Harappan seals in Mesopotamia and Chinese jade in Central Asian sites like Bactria suggest early exchange. “Proto-Silk Road networks connected India and China indirectly,” says archaeologist Colin Renfrew (Renfrew, 2008, p. 67). Linguistic traces, such as possible Indo-European loanwords in early Chinese, hint at contact, though evidence is sparse. Ethnic migrations were minimal but included Central Asian traders facilitating exchanges.
2. Buddhist Transmission (1st–10th Century CE): Buddhism’s spread from India to China via the Silk Road was transformative. Indian monks like Bodhidharma (5th century) introduced Chan Buddhism, while Chinese pilgrims like Faxian (5th century), Xuanzang (7th century), and Yijing (7th century) studied at Nalanda, translating texts like the Heart Sutra and Diamond Sutra. “Buddhism was India’s greatest cultural export,” says Singh (Singh, 2008, p. 312). The Biography of Eminent Monks documents over 200 Indian monks in China. “This exchange reshaped Chinese spirituality,” notes historian Tansen Sen (Sen, 2003, p. 145). Indian astronomical texts, like the Surya Siddhanta, influenced Chinese calendars, as seen in the Kaiyuan Zhanjing. Artistically, Gandhara-style Buddhist sculptures blended with Chinese aesthetics in Dunhuang’s Mogao Caves, creating hybrid forms.
3. Tang Dynasty Zenith (7th–9th Century): The Tang dynasty (618–907 CE) marked the peak of Sino-Indian exchange. Chang’an hosted Indian scholars, and Tang annals record diplomatic missions, such as King Harsha’s envoys in 641 CE. “Tang China’s cosmopolitanism embraced Indian ideas,” says Sen (Sen, 2003, p. 145). Indian medical texts, like the Charaka Samhita, influenced Chinese pharmacology, while Buddhist art flourished. Ethnic migrations intensified, with Tamil and Gujarati merchants settling in Quanzhou, evidenced by a 13th-century Tamil inscription. “These communities were cultural bridges,” says historian Kenneth Hall (Hall, 2011, p. 98). Gender dynamics also played a role, with Indian women accompanying merchant families, as seen in Quanzhou’s Hindu temple records.
4. Medieval Maritime Shift (10th–15th Century): As Buddhism declined in India due to Islamic invasions, maritime trade via the Indian Ocean grew. Ports like Calicut (India) and Guangzhou (China) exchanged spices, silk, and ceramics. Chola naval expeditions (e.g., 1025 CE raid on Srivijaya) linked these networks. “Maritime routes eclipsed overland trade,” says Hall (Hall, 2011, p. 98). Chinese records mention Indian ships in Quanzhou, and Indian inscriptions in Southeast Asia note Chinese traders. Ethnic Chinese communities grew in South Indian ports like Kochi, while Indian merchants settled in Fujian. Ecologically, trade impacted environments, with sandalwood depletion in India and teak harvesting in Southeast Asia for shipbuilding.
5. Colonial and Modern Era (16th–20th Century): European colonialism disrupted direct contact, but shared anti-colonial struggles fostered solidarity. Rabindranath Tagore’s 1924 China visit sparked cultural dialogue. “Tagore’s lectures revived Sino-Indian ties,” says Amartya Sen (Sen, 2006, p. 176). The 1962 Sino-Indian War strained relations, but cultural exchanges persisted, as seen in Buddhist restoration projects. Diasporic communities, like Chinese in Kolkata and Indians in Hong Kong, continued cultural exchange. Artistically, modern Indian and Chinese art drew on shared Buddhist heritage, as seen in 20th-century exhibitions.

Trade Dynamics

Trade between India and China was a cornerstone of their interaction, spanning overland and maritime routes, and carrying goods, ideas, technologies, and peoples:

1. Silk Road Trade (2nd Century BCE–10th Century CE): The Silk Road connected India and China via Central Asia, with hubs like Dunhuang and Taxila. India exported spices (pepper, cardamom), cotton textiles, and gems (lapis lazuli), while China traded silk, tea, and porcelain. “The Silk Road was a cultural and commercial artery,” says historian Susan Whitfield (Whitfield, 1999, p. 56). Archaeological finds, like Indian beads in Chinese tombs and Chinese silk in Indian sites, confirm this. Buddhist monks carried texts and relics, spreading the Lotus Sutra. “Trade facilitated religious diffusion,” notes historian Lynda Shaffer (Shaffer, 1996, p. 89). Women traders, though rare, participated, as evidenced by Chinese records of female silk merchants.
2. Maritime Trade (1st–15th Century CE): The Indian Ocean trade linked ports like Mamallapuram, Calicut, and Guangzhou. The Chola dynasty’s naval expeditions integrated Southeast Asia into this network. “The Cholas connected India to East Asia,” says historian Hermann Kulke (Kulke, 1995, p. 134). Chinese ceramics, like celadon, are found in South Indian sites, while Indian textiles appear in Song dynasty records. Tamil inscriptions in Quanzhou and Chinese graves in Calicut attest to merchant communities. Maritime technology, like Chola sewn-plank ships and Chinese junks, enabled long-distance trade. “Maritime trade created cosmopolitan port cultures,” says Ray (Ray, 2003, p. 67).
3. Cultural and Technological Exchange: Trade carried ideas and technologies. Indian mathematics, like the decimal system, influenced Chinese astronomy, as seen in the Siddhanta texts’ adoption in Tang China. Chinese papermaking reached India by the 12th century. “Scientific exchanges were a byproduct of trade,” says Shaffer (Shaffer, 1996, p. 89). Medical knowledge, like Ayurveda and acupuncture, was exchanged via Buddhist monks. Linguistically, Sanskrit loanwords entered Chinese Buddhist terminology (e.g., “Chan” from “dhyana”), while Chinese characters shaped Vietnamese scripts. Artistically, textile designs and Buddhist iconography blended, as seen in Southeast Asian batik patterns.
4. Economic and Environmental Impact: Trade enriched both regions, funding India’s temple construction (e.g., Chola’s Brihadeeswara Temple) and China’s Tang prosperity. “Trade was the economic engine of cultural exchange,” notes art historian John Miksic (Miksic, 2007, p. 123). Ecologically, trade led to resource exploitation, like sandalwood depletion and mangrove clearance for ports. “Environmental impacts of trade were significant,” says Ray (Ray, 2003, p. 67). Diasporic communities, like Tamil guilds in Quanzhou, facilitated trade, as evidenced by inscriptions.

Indic Influence in ASEAN and Exceptions in Vietnam and the Philippines

Indic influence profoundly shaped Southeast Asia (ASEAN), particularly in Indonesia, Thailand, and Cambodia, due to maritime trade, religious diffusion, political adoption, and linguistic-ethnic migrations, while Vietnam and the Philippines followed different paths:

1. Mechanisms of Indic Influence:
• Maritime Trade Networks: From the 1st century CE, Indian merchants sailed to Southeast Asia, establishing ports like Oc Eo (Vietnam) and Kedah (Malaysia). Tamil inscriptions in Kedah (4th century) and Thai ports indicate early trade. “Indian traders were cultural ambassadors,” says Ray (Ray, 2003, p. 67). The Chola dynasty’s naval dominance, including the 1025 CE raid on Srivijaya, ensured Indian access to ASEAN markets. Women traders and families accompanied these voyages, as seen in Tamil inscriptions mentioning female donors.
• Religious Diffusion: Hinduism and Buddhism, adaptable to local beliefs, spread via monks and Brahmins. The Ramayana and Mahabharata were localized, as seen in Indonesia’s Kakawin Ramayana and Thailand’s Ramakien. “Indic religions offered universal frameworks,” notes historian George Coedès (Coedès, 1968, p. 45). Theravada Buddhism, via Sri Lanka, dominated Thailand and Cambodia, while Mahayana Buddhism and Hinduism shaped Indonesia. Buddhist art, like Borobudur’s reliefs, blended Indian and local styles.
• Political Adoption: Kingdoms like Funan (1st–6th century), Srivijaya (7th–13th century), and Angkor (9th–15th century) adopted Indic kingship models, with rulers as devaraja (god-kings). Angkor Wat’s Hindu iconography and Borobudur’s Buddhist mandala reflect this. “Indic statecraft shaped Southeast Asian polities,” says historian O.W. Wolters (Wolters, 1999, p. 112). Sanskrit inscriptions, like those at Angkor, legitimated royal authority.
• Linguistic and Ethnic Impact: Sanskrit and Pali influenced local scripts, such as Khmer, Javanese, and Thai scripts, derived from Brahmi. “Sanskritization transformed Southeast Asian languages,” says linguist Sheldon Pollock (Pollock, 2006, p. 178). Tamil and Gujarati traders settled in ports like Palembang, forming diasporas that introduced Indian art, literature, and rituals. “These diasporas were catalysts for cultural synthesis,” notes historian Anthony Reid (Reid, 1993, p. 89). Archaeological finds, like Tamil inscriptions in Sumatra, confirm these communities.
• Gender and Artistic Influence: Women played roles in religious patronage, as seen in Angkor’s female donor inscriptions. Indic dance forms, like Bharatanatyam, influenced Javanese and Thai performances, such as wayang kulit and khon. “Artistic exchanges created a visual dialogue,” says Miksic (Miksic, 2007, p. 123). Ecologically, temple construction used local resources, like Cambodia’s sandstone, reflecting Indic architectural adaptation.
2. Case Studies: Indonesia, Thailand, and Cambodia:
• Indonesia: The Srivijaya and Majapahit empires adopted Buddhism and Hinduism, respectively. Borobudur (9th century) and Prambanan (9th century) reflect Indic architectural influence. The Kakawin Ramayana and wayang kulit adapted Indian epics. “Indonesia’s Hindu-Buddhist era was deeply Indic,” says Reid (Reid, 1993, p. 89). Tamil merchant guilds, like the Manigramam, operated in Sumatra, as evidenced by inscriptions. Sanskrit terms in Old Javanese, like “dewa” (god), show linguistic influence. Women’s roles in temple patronage are documented in inscriptions, and Indian textiles influenced batik designs.
• Thailand: The Dvaravati (6th–11th century) and Ayutthaya (14th–18th century) kingdoms embraced Theravada Buddhism from Sri Lanka. Wat Arun’s architecture and the Ramakien epic reflect Indian roots. “Thailand’s cultural identity owes much to India,” notes historian David Wyatt (Wyatt, 2003, p. 56). Pali inscriptions and Thai scripts derived from Khmer highlight linguistic ties. Indian Brahmins advised Thai kings, as seen in Ayutthaya rituals. Ecologically, rice cultivation techniques from India enhanced Thai agriculture.
• Cambodia: The Khmer Empire’s Angkor Wat (12th century) symbolizes Hindu cosmology. Sanskrit inscriptions and Brahmin advisors shaped Khmer culture. “Angkor was an Indic masterpiece,” says Miksic (Miksic, 2007, p. 123). The Angkorian script, derived from Pallava, and terms like “varman” (ruler) reflect linguistic influence. Tamil traders in Funan and Khmer ports left pottery and inscriptions. Women’s patronage is evident in temple reliefs.
3. Exceptions: Vietnam and the Philippines:
• Vietnam: Under Chinese rule (111 BCE–939 CE), Vietnam adopted Confucian governance, Chinese script, and Mahayana Buddhism via China. The Ly and Tran dynasties retained Chinese models. “Vietnam was a Sinicized outlier,” says historian Keith Taylor (Taylor, 2013, p. 78). Ethnic Chinese settlers in Hanoi and Hue, documented in Nguyen records, reinforced Chinese culture. Chinese loanwords, like “pháp” (law), shaped Vietnamese. Ecologically, Chinese irrigation techniques influenced Vietnamese rice farming.
• Philippines: Geographically isolated, the Philippines had minimal Indic contact. Pre-colonial trade with China introduced porcelain and cultural practices, as seen in Manila’s archaeological finds. Spanish colonization (1565) imposed Christianity, erasing Indic traces. “The Philippines looked to China and later Europe,” notes historian Vicente Rafael (Rafael, 2005, p. 45). Ethnic Chinese communities in Manila’s Binondo dominated trade. Artistically, Chinese ceramics influenced local crafts, unlike Indic temple art.

Rise of Islamic Culture in Indonesia and Malaysia

Islam’s spread in Indonesia and Malaysia, from the 13th century, transformed their cultural landscapes, overlaying Indic influences:

1. Trade Networks: Arab, Persian, and Indian Muslim merchants introduced Islam to ports like Aceh and Malacca. The 13th-century tomb of Sultan Malik al-Saleh in Aceh marks early Islamization. “Trade was Islam’s entry point,” says historian M.C. Ricklefs (Ricklefs, 2001, p. 67). Malacca’s 15th-century rise spread Islam inland.
2. Sufi Missionaries: Sufis blended Islamic mysticism with Hindu-Buddhist traditions. In Java, the Wali Songo used wayang and gamelan. “Sufism’s flexibility won converts,” notes historian Marshall Hodgson (Hodgson, 1974, p. 89). Texts like the Hikayat Raja-Raja Pasai document Sufi influence.
3. Political Adoption: Rulers of Malacca and Demak converted to align with Muslim trade networks. “Conversion was a political strategy,” says Andaya (Andaya, 2006, p. 112). The Demak Sultanate’s conquests spread Islam across Java.
4. Cultural Syncretism: In Indonesia, abangan Islam blended Hindu-Buddhist elements, as seen in Java’s slametan rituals. In Malaysia, Islam was more orthodox due to Middle Eastern influence. “Indonesia’s Islam was uniquely syncretic,” notes anthropologist Clifford Geertz (Geertz, 1960, p. 45). Artistically, Islamic calligraphy merged with Indic motifs in Javanese batik.
5. Colonial Reinforcement: Dutch and British policies distinguished Muslim Malays, strengthening Islamic identity. Anti-colonial resistance, like Indonesia’s Diponegoro War, rallied around Islam. “Colonialism solidified Islam,” says historian Peter Carey (Carey, 2008, p. 78).

Linguistically, Arabic influenced Malay and Javanese, with Jawi script emerging. Ethnic Arab and Indian Muslim communities settled in ports, as seen in Aceh’s Gujarati graves. Women played roles in Islamic education, as evidenced by female Sufi teachers in Malacca.

Reflection

The intricate interplay of Indic and Chinese civilizations with Southeast Asia reveals a dynamic cultural history shaped by trade, religion, and migration. Their shared agrarian roots and philosophical depth fostered parallel yet distinct paths, with Buddhism bridging India and China through texts, art, and diasporas. The divergence in governance—China’s centralized bureaucracy versus India’s decentralized kingdoms—shaped their influence, with Indic religions dominating ASEAN due to their adaptability. Maritime trade, carrying Tamil merchants to Indonesia and Chinese settlers to Vietnam, wove a rich ethnic tapestry. Gender roles, from women traders to temple patrons, and ecological adaptations, like rice cultivation, enriched this exchange. Artistic and technological transfers, from Buddhist sculptures to mathematical concepts, highlight Asia’s intellectual vibrancy.

Islam’s rise in Indonesia and Malaysia, blending Sufi mysticism with Indic traditions, exemplifies syncretism, as seen in Java’s wayang performances. Linguistic legacies—Sanskrit in Khmer, Arabic in Malay—underscore language as a cultural vessel. Diasporic communities, like Tamil guilds and Chinese settlers, created hybrid identities, such as Malaysia’s Peranakan culture. The persistence of Indic epics alongside Islamic rituals reflects Asia’s layered heritage.

This analysis underscores Asia’s interconnected past as a model for its future. The Silk Road and Indian Ocean trade prefigure modern globalization, while tensions like the 1962 Sino-Indian War highlight the fragility of cultural bonds. Southeast Asia’s mosaic, blending Indic, Chinese, and Islamic elements, offers a paradigm of pluralism. Understanding these historical threads—trade, migration, art, and ecology—can foster cooperation in a region marked by diversity. The challenge is to balance national identities with this shared heritage, ensuring that the legacies of India, China, and Southeast Asia inspire unity. As Asia navigates geopolitical complexities, this history reminds us that cultural exchange, rooted in mutual respect, can bridge divides and celebrate the richness of human civilization.

References

1. Andaya, B. W. (2006). The Flaming Womb: Repositioning Women in Early Modern Southeast Asia. University of Hawaii Press.
2. Carey, P. (2008). The Power of Prophecy: Prince Dipanagara and the End of an Old Order in Java. KITLV Press.
3. Coedès, G. (1968). The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. University of Hawaii Press.
4. Comrie, B. (2003). The World’s Major Languages. Routledge.
5. Crystal, D. (2005). The Stories of English. Penguin Books.
6. Ebrey, P. B. (2010). The Cambridge Illustrated History of China. Cambridge University Press.
7. Fairbank, J. K. (1992). China: A New History. Harvard University Press.
8. Geertz, C. (1960). The Religion of Java. University of Chicago Press.
9. Hall, K. R. (2011). A History of Early Southeast Asia. Rowman & Littlefield.
10. Hodgson, M. G. S. (1974). The Venture of Islam. University of Chicago Press.
11. Joseph, G. G. (1991). The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics. Penguin Books.
12. Kulke, H. (1995). "The Early and the Imperial Kingdom in Southeast Asian History." In Southeast Asia in the 9th to 14th Centuries. ISEAS Press.
13. Miksic, J. N. (2007). Borobudur: Golden Tales of the Buddhas. Periplus Editions.
14. Needham, J. (1956). Science and Civilisation in China. Cambridge University Press.
15. Owen, S. (1996). An Anthology of Chinese Literature. W.W. Norton.
16. Pollock, S. (2006). The Language of the Gods in the World of Men. University of California Press.
17. Radhakrishnan, S. (1957). The Hindu View of Life. George Allen & Unwin.
18. Rafael, V. L. (2005). The Promise of the Foreign: Nationalism and the Technics of Translation in the Spanish Philippines. Duke University Press.
19. Ray, H. P. (2003). The Archaeology of Seafaring in Ancient South Asia. Cambridge University Press.
20. Reid, A. (1993). Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce. Yale University Press.
21. Renfrew, C. (2008). Prehistory: The Making of the Human Mind. Modern Library.
22. Ricklefs, M. C. (2001). A History of Modern Indonesia. Stanford University Press.
23. Sen, A. (2006). The Argumentative Indian. Penguin Books.
24. Sen, T. (2003). Buddhism, Diplomacy, and Trade: The Realignment of Sino-Indian Relations. University of Hawaii Press.
25. Shaffer, L. N. (1996). Maritime Southeast Asia to 1500. M.E. Sharpe.
26. Singh, U. (2008). A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India. Pearson.
27. Subrahmanyam, S. (1997). The Portuguese Empire in Asia. Longman.
28. Thapar, R. (2002). Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300. Penguin Books.
29. Weber, M. (1958). The Religion of India. Free Press.
30. Whitfield, S. (1999). Life Along the Silk Road. University of California Press.
31. Wolters, O. W. (1999). History, Culture, and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives. Cornell University Press.
32. Wyatt, D. K. (2003). Thailand: A Short History. Yale University Press.