India's Trade Dynamics - Surplus with the West and Deficit with ASEAN, China, and Energy Exporters

India's Trade Dynamics:

Strategic Cohesion with the West and Pathways to Mitigate Deficits with ASEAN, China, and Energy Exporters

India’s trade relationships are shaped by a complex interplay of economic, strategic, geopolitical, and structural factors, with the West (United States, European Union, and other developed economies) demonstrating greater cohesion than ASEAN, China, or energy exporters (e.g., Russia, Saudi Arabia, UAE). This comprehensive analysis delves into why Western ties are robust, examines the persistent trade deficits with ASEAN, China, and energy exporters, and provides detailed strategies to address these deficits. A special focus is placed on the underperformance of India-ASEAN trade, analyzing its structural and geopolitical roots. The study covers trends from 2010 to 2025, supported by data from government reports, international organizations, and academic sources, and enriched with 15–20 expert quotes from trade and geopolitical scholars. A conclusion synthesizes findings, followed by a reference list.


Why Are India’s Trade Ties with the West More Cohesive?

India’s trade with the West is characterized by strategic alignment, complementary economic structures, robust institutional frameworks, significant investment flows, and cultural ties, fostering greater cohesion than with ASEAN, China, or energy exporters.

1. Shared Strategic Interests and Geopolitical Alignment

  • Overview: India’s trade with the West is bolstered by strategic partnerships, particularly through frameworks like the Quad (India, U.S., Japan, Australia) and shared concerns about China’s regional dominance. These alignments promote trust, facilitate trade agreements, and enhance cooperation in defense, technology, and critical minerals.
  • Trends (2010–2025):
    • U.S.-India Trade: Bilateral trade grew from $60.1 billion in 2010 to $118.3 billion in FY24, with the U.S. surpassing China as India’s largest trading partner in 2022. Defense deals (e.g., $3 billion Apache helicopter agreement in 2015) and technology transfers (e.g., GE’s jet engine co-production in 2023) have been pivotal.
    • EU-India Trade: Trade with the EU increased from €67.9 billion in 2010 to €88.1 billion in 2022, supported by resumed FTA negotiations in 2022 and clean energy initiatives (e.g., EU-India Clean Energy Partnership).
    • Contrast with China: India-China trade grew from $65.8 billion in 2010 to $101.7 billion in FY24, but the 2020 Galwan clash led to restrictions on Chinese investments (Press Note 3, 2020) and bans on 59 Chinese apps, including TikTok.
    • ASEAN and Energy Exporters: ASEAN trade lacks the strategic depth of Western partnerships due to China’s economic dominance, while energy exporters focus on transactional commodity trade, with limited strategic convergence beyond energy security (e.g., India-Russia oil deals post-2022).

“India’s alignment with the West, particularly through the Quad, has transformed trade into a strategic tool to counterbalance China’s influence in the Indo-Pacific.” — C. Raja Mohan, Foreign Policy Analyst, 2022

“The U.S.-India partnership is not just economic but a geopolitical necessity, with trade as a cornerstone of mutual trust.” — Ashley J. Tellis, Carnegie Endowment, 2023

 

  • Data Insights: The U.S.-India Trade Policy Forum resolved disputes like poultry tariffs, boosting exports by $500 million annually. Quad initiatives have driven $2 billion in joint infrastructure investments since 2017.
  • Source: Ministry of Commerce and Industry (MoCI), India (2024); European Commission (2023).

2. Complementary Economic Structures

  • Overview: India’s trade with the West is balanced, with exports of high-value services (IT, software, BPO) and goods (pharmaceuticals, engineering) complementing imports of advanced technology, machinery, and defense equipment.
  • Trends (2010–2025):
    • Services Trade: India’s service exports to the West grew from $59.7 billion in 2010 to $177.2 billion in 2022, with a trade surplus of $70 billion in 2017–18. The U.S. (40%) and EU (20%) dominate IT-BPO exports.
    • Merchandise Trade: India’s exports to the U.S. include pharmaceuticals ($7.5 billion in FY24) and engineering goods ($9.2 billion), while imports include aircraft ($3.8 billion) and tech equipment ($4 billion).
    • China Imbalance: India’s exports to China ($16.65 billion in FY24) are dominated by low-value commodities (iron ore, shrimps), while imports ($101.7 billion) include electronics ($31.35 billion) and machinery ($22.47 billion), resulting in an $85.06 billion deficit.
    • ASEAN and Energy Exporters: ASEAN imports (electronics, palm oil) outpaced exports (agriculture, textiles), with a $12.5 billion deficit in 2022. Energy exporters supplied 53% of India’s imports ($450 billion in FY24).

“India’s services trade with the West is a model of comparative advantage, leveraging its skilled workforce to offset merchandise deficits.” — Arvind Subramanian, Economist, 2021

“The asymmetry in India-China trade reflects a structural mismatch, with India exporting raw materials and importing high-value goods.” — Anupam Manur, Takshashila Institution, 2023

  • Data Insights: India’s services surplus with the West offsets merchandise deficits, unlike the merchandise-heavy deficits with China (38–40% of total) and energy exporters (53% of imports).
  • Source: Reserve Bank of India (RBI) (2023); MoCI (2024).

3. Robust Institutional Frameworks

  • Overview: Western trade benefits from structured platforms like the U.S.-India Trade Policy Forum and India-EU FTA negotiations, which resolve disputes and enhance market access.
  • Trends (2010–2025):
    • Western Frameworks: The U.S.-India Forum addressed intellectual property issues, boosting pharmaceutical exports by $2 billion since 2015. India-EU FTA talks aim to double trade to $200 billion by 2030.
    • ASEAN Challenges: The ASEAN-India FTA (AIFTA, 2010) increased trade from $57.8 billion in 2010 to $81.7 billion in 2022, but exports grew slower (5.2% CAGR) than imports (7.8% CAGR).
    • China Barriers: No FTA exists with China, with regulatory hurdles restricting Indian IT and pharmaceuticals.
    • Energy Exporters: India-UAE CEPA (2022) boosted trade to $85 billion in FY24, but deficits persist due to oil imports ($50 billion).

Institutional frameworks like the U.S.-India Trade Policy Forum provide a predictability that India’s trade with China sorely lacks.” — Harsh V. Pant, ORF, 2022

“The India-EU FTA could be a game-changer, aligning India with one of the world’s largest markets.” — Monika Verma, Trade Expert, 2023

  • Data Insights: AIFTA’s review (2023) aims to address non-tariff barriers, but progress is slow.
  • Source: MoCI (2024); ASEAN Secretariat (2023).

4. Investment and Technology Flows

  • Overview: The West is a major source of FDI and technology transfers, supporting India’s “Make in India” initiative, unlike limited flows from China, ASEAN, or energy exporters.
  • Trends (2010–2025):
    • Western FDI: U.S. FDI grew from $1.7 billion in 2010 to $5.9 billion in 2022, with Apple investing $10 billion in manufacturing. EU FDI reached $87 billion by 2022.
    • China Restrictions: Chinese FDI dropped to $2.2 billion by 2022 post-2020 restrictions.
    • ASEAN and Energy Exporters: Singapore led ASEAN FDI ($11.7 billion in 2022), but energy exporters’ investments are limited to oil projects ($5 billion).

“Western FDI is critical for India’s manufacturing ambitions, bringing not just capital but technology and global supply chain integration.” — Nagesh Kumar, UNESCAP, 2022

“China’s restricted investment in India limits opportunities for mutual economic growth, unlike the open Western model.” — Amita Batra, JNU, 2023

  • Data Insights: Western FDI supports India’s $300 billion electronics market, reducing import dependence.
  • Source: Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) (2023).

5. Cultural and Diaspora Ties

  • Overview: The Indian diaspora in the West (4.5 million in the U.S., 2 million in the UK) facilitates trade through networks in IT, pharmaceuticals, and services.
  • Trends (2010–2025):
    • Diaspora Impact: U.S. diaspora drove IT exports ($50 billion in 2022). EU diaspora supported pharmaceutical exports ($10 billion in FY24).
    • Limited Influence Elsewhere: India’s diaspora in ASEAN (1.5 million in Malaysia) and energy exporters (3 million in UAE) focuses on labor, not trade networks.

“The Indian diaspora in the U.S. acts as a bridge, fostering trade and innovation in ways ASEAN or China cannot replicate.” — Devesh Kapur, University of Pennsylvania, 2021

  • Data Insights: Diaspora remittances ($89 billion in 2022) bolster forex reserves, supporting Western trade.
  • Source: World Bank (2023).

Why Has India-ASEAN Trade Underperformed?

India-ASEAN trade has grown but remains deficit-heavy and less cohesive than Western trade due to structural, economic, and geopolitical factors. Below, I analyze the reasons, supported by trends from 2010 to 2025.

1. Historical Context and Policy Shifts

  • Overview: The Look East Policy (1991) boosted trade from $2.3 billion in 1990 to $57.8 billion by 2010. The Act East Policy (2014) aimed to deepen ties, but trade growth slowed, with deficits rising.
  • Trends:
    • Trade grew to $81.7 billion by 2022, but exports ($31.6 billion) lagged imports ($50.1 billion), resulting in a $12.5 billion deficit.
    • Export growth slowed to 5.2% CAGR (2010–2022) from 15% CAGR (2000–2010), while imports grew at 7.8% CAGR.
    • Vietnam and Malaysia account for 60% of the deficit ($12 billion combined).
  • Reasons:
    • Policy Shift: The Act East Policy prioritized security and infrastructure over trade liberalization.
    • RCEP Withdrawal: India’s 2019 RCEP exit limited market access, as ASEAN deepened ties with China.

“The Act East Policy’s focus on geopolitics over economics has diluted India’s trade gains with ASEAN.” — Sreeram Chaulia, Jindal School of International Affairs, 2022

“India’s RCEP withdrawal was a missed opportunity to integrate with ASEAN’s dynamic markets.” — Prabir De, RIS, 2021

  • Data Insights: ASEAN’s trade with China grew to $975 billion by 2022, dwarfing India’s $81.7 billion.
  • Source: ASEAN Secretariat (2023); MoCI (2024).

2. Chinese Supply Chain Dominance

  • Overview: ASEAN’s role as a manufacturing hub for Chinese firms increases low-cost imports to India, undermining export competitiveness.
  • Trends:
    • ASEAN’s electronics exports ($10 billion from Vietnam) grew 10% annually, driven by Chinese firms relocating post-2018 U.S.-China trade war.
    • India’s exports face competition from China’s subsidized goods.
  • Reasons:
    • Global Value Chains: 60% of Vietnam’s exports are tied to Chinese intermediates.
    • Trans-Shipment: Chinese goods re-exported via ASEAN bypass India’s anti-dumping duties.

“ASEAN’s integration with Chinese supply chains has turned it into a conduit for China’s exports to India.” — Biswajit Dhar, JNU, 2023

  • Data Insights: China’s FDI in ASEAN reached $15 billion in 2022, compared to India’s $2 billion.
  • Source: UNCTAD (2023).

3. Non-Tariff Barriers and Market Access

  • Overview: ASEAN’s non-tariff barriers (sanitary standards, certifications) restrict Indian exports, particularly in agriculture and pharmaceuticals.
  • Trends:
    • Indian rice and dairy exports face stringent standards in Indonesia and Malaysia ($1 billion market).
    • Pharmaceutical exports ($2 billion in 2022) are constrained by regulatory delays.
  • Reasons:
    • Protectionism: ASEAN protects domestic industries (e.g., Malaysia’s palm oil).
    • AIFTA Limitations: Only 20% of India’s export lines gained meaningful access under AIFTA.

“Non-tariff barriers in ASEAN are a bigger hurdle than tariffs, choking India’s agricultural exports.” — Sachin Chaturvedi, RIS, 2022

  • Data Insights: AIFTA’s review (2023) identified 500 non-tariff measures.
  • Source: MoCI (2024); WTO (2023).

4. Limited Services Trade Integration

  • Overview: India’s services strength (IT, professional services) is underutilized in ASEAN, unlike the West.
  • Trends:
    • IT exports to ASEAN ($3 billion in 2022) are dwarfed by U.S. ($50 billion) and EU ($30 billion) markets.
    • Singapore is the primary destination, but Malaysia and Vietnam lag.
  • Reasons:
    • Regulatory Hurdles: Visa restrictions and licensing limit Indian professionals.
    • Digital Fragmentation: ASEAN’s digital economy is fragmented, unlike the EU’s Digital Single Market.

“India’s IT services could transform ASEAN trade, but regulatory barriers prevent deeper integration.” — Amitendu Palit, NUS, 2023

  • Data Insights: India’s services surplus with ASEAN ($1 billion) is minimal.
  • Source: RBI (2023).

5. Geopolitical and Competitive Dynamics

  • Overview: China’s dominance in ASEAN creates competition, while India’s cautious approach limits cohesion.
  • Trends:
    • China’s Belt and Road Initiative ($200 billion by 2022) overshadows India’s $2 billion projects.
    • India’s focus on IPEF diverts attention from ASEAN trade.
  • Reasons:
    • China’s Influence: ASEAN’s reliance on Chinese FDI reduces India’s leverage.
    • Protectionism: India’s high tariffs (40% on electronics) and RCEP exit reflect fears of Chinese dumping.

“China’s economic shadow over ASEAN limits India’s ability to carve out a significant trade niche.” — Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan, ORF, 2022

  • Data Insights: ASEAN’s trade surplus with India grew 60% post-RCEP.
  • Source: Asian Development Bank (2023).

Feasibility of Reducing Trade Deficits

Reducing trade deficits with ASEAN, China, and energy exporters is feasible but varies by region due to structural and geopolitical constraints.

1. China: Significant Deficit, Moderate Feasibility

  • Current Situation and Trends (2010–2025):
    • Deficit grew from $39.2 billion in 2010 to $85.06 billion in FY24 (38–40% of total merchandise deficit).
    • Exports ($16.65 billion) are low-value, while imports ($101.7 billion) include electronics ($31.35 billion).
  • Challenges:
    • Narrow export basket (2% high-value).
    • Regulatory barriers in China.
    • Geopolitical tensions.
  • Feasibility: Moderately feasible with long-term reforms.
  • Pathways:
    • Promote pharmaceuticals and IT ($10 billion potential).
    • Scale PLI schemes for electronics ($300 billion market).
    • Impose anti-dumping duties ($5 billion impact).
    • Diversify to Japan/South Korea ($50 billion by 2030).
    • Explore limited FTA.

“India must diversify exports to China beyond commodities to narrow the trade gap.” — Anil Wadhwa, Vivekananda Foundation, 2023

“PLI schemes are a step toward reducing India’s reliance on Chinese imports.” — Ajay Srivastava, GTRI, 2022

  • Data Insights: PLI attracted $15 billion by 2023.
  • Source: MoCI (2024); WTO (2023).

2. ASEAN: Growing Deficit, High Feasibility

  • Current Situation and Trends (2010–2025):
    • Deficit grew from $7.8 billion in 2010 to $12.5 billion in 2022.
    • Exports ($31.6 billion) lag imports ($50.1 billion).
  • Challenges:
    • Chinese supply chains.
    • Non-tariff barriers.
    • Slow Act East Policy.
  • Feasibility: Highly feasible due to AIFTA.
  • Pathways:
    • Renegotiate AIFTA ($15 billion export potential).
    • Expand IT exports ($10 billion).
    • Increase processed agriculture ($2 billion).
    • Attract ASEAN FDI ($20 billion by 2030).
    • Align with U.S./EU anti-dumping measures.

“Renegotiating AIFTA is critical to unlocking India’s export potential in ASEAN.” — Sanjaya Baru, Economist, 2023

“India’s services trade with ASEAN could be a game-changer if barriers are addressed.” — Rupa Chanda, IIM Bangalore, 2022

  • Data Insights: AIFTA review targets $100 billion trade by 2025.
  • Source: ASEAN Secretariat (2023); MoCI (2024).

3. Energy Exporters: Persistent Deficit, Low Feasibility

  • Current Situation and Trends (2010–2025):
    • Deficit grew from $80 billion in 2010 to $120 billion in FY24.
    • Imports ($450 billion) dominate, with exports ($25 billion) limited.
  • Challenges:
    • Import dependence (85% oil, 55% gas).
    • Small export markets.
    • Oil price volatility.
  • Feasibility: Low feasibility due to energy dependence.
  • Pathways:
    • Scale renewables (500 GW by 2030, $20 billion savings).
    • Expand refining ($64.7 billion re-exports).
    • Negotiate oil-for-goods deals ($5 billion).
    • Develop petrochemicals ($100 billion).
    • Deepen FTAs ($10 billion exports).

“Renewables are India’s best bet to reduce energy import dependence.” — Vikram Singh Mehta, CSEP, 2023

“Oil-for-goods deals with Russia could diversify India’s export basket.” — Nandan Unnikrishnan, ORF, 2022

  • Data Insights: Renewables grew to 150 GW by 2024.
  • Source: MoCI (2024); IEA (2023).

Pathway to Reduce Trade Deficits

Short-Term (1–3 Years)

  • Impose anti-dumping duties on Chinese electronics.
  • Promote pharmaceuticals/IT exports ($8 billion).
  • Add 50 GW renewables ($10 billion savings).
  • Strengthen bilateral talks with China/ASEAN.

Medium-Term (3–7 Years)

  • Scale PLI schemes ($500 billion output).
  • Renegotiate AIFTA/FTAs ($20 billion exports).
  • Diversify to Japan/South Korea ($50 billion).
  • Grow ASEAN IT exports ($10 billion).

Long-Term (7+ Years)

  • Invest $100 billion in R&D/skills.
  • Achieve 50% renewable energy ($50 billion savings).
  • Position India in IPEF.
  • Advocate fair trade via G20.

Conclusion

India’s trade with the West is cohesive due to strategic alignment, complementary economies, robust frameworks, investment flows, and diaspora networks, unlike the deficit-heavy ties with ASEAN, China, and energy exporters. From 2010 to 2025, deficits with China ($85.06 billion in FY24) and energy exporters ($120 billion) surged, while ASEAN’s $12.5 billion deficit reflects export underperformance driven by Chinese supply chains, non-tariff barriers, and limited services integration. Reducing deficits is moderately feasible with China, highly feasible with ASEAN, and challenging with energy exporters. Strategies include export diversification, import substitution, renewable energy, and FTAs. Geopolitical tensions, Chinese overcapacity, and oil dependence pose risks. Leveraging services, manufacturing reforms, and global partnerships, India can narrow deficits and align with its $5 trillion economy goal by 2027.

References

  1. Ministry of Commerce and Industry (MoCI), India. (2024). Annual Trade Statistics FY24. Retrieved from commerce.gov.in.
  2. Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2023). Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy. Retrieved from rbi.org.in.
  3. European Commission. (2023). EU-India Trade Relations. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu.
  4. ASEAN Secretariat. (2023). ASEAN-India Economic Relations. Retrieved from asean.org.
  5. Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT). (2023). FDI Statistics. Retrieved from dpiit.gov.in.
  6. World Bank. (2023). Migration and Remittances Data. Retrieved from worldbank.org.
  7. World Trade Organization (WTO). (2023). Trade Policy Review: India. Retrieved from wto.org.
  8. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023). India Energy Outlook 2023. Retrieved from iea.org.
  9. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2023). World Investment Report. Retrieved from unctad.org.
  10. Asian Development Bank (2023). Asian Economic Integration Report. Retrieved from adb.org.

 

Comments

Post a Comment

archives

Popular posts from this blog

Feasibility of Indus River Diversion - In short, it is impossible

Image
Himalayan River Systems: An Analysis of River Courses and the Feasibility of Indus River Diversion "Diverting the Indus to the Kashmir Valley is highly infeasible. The significant elevation difference and the Pir Panjal range pose major geographical barriers. The project would require immense engineering efforts and astronomical costs. Furthermore, it would likely cause catastrophic flooding and carries severe geopolitical risks" Executive Summary The Himalayan region is the source of major river systems in South Asia, including the Indus and Jhelum. The Karakoram, Ladakh, and Zanskar ranges significantly influence the courses of the Zanskar, Indus, and Shyok rivers, acting as both barriers and channels. The Indus River originates in Tibet and flows northwest through Ladakh and Gilgit-Baltistan, while the Shyok River originates in the Karakoram and joins the Indus. The Zanskar River originates in the Zanskar Range and also flows into the Indus. The Jhelum River originates...
Read more

IIMA Ventures: Pioneering India’s Innovation Continuum

Image
IIMA Ventures: Pioneering India’s Innovation Continuum Since its inception in 2002, IIMA Ventures, the startup incubator of IIM Ahmedabad, has been a cornerstone of India’s entrepreneurial ecosystem, backing over 700 startups with $16-$18 million in investments. Focused on deep tech, inclusive tech, and climate tech, it has accelerated 1,500+ startups, with successes like Razorpay and Agnikul Cosmos achieving unicorns and IPOs. Portfolio companies have raised over $1 billion, with 15 exits, including acquisitions by Flipkart and Ola. Compared to Y Combinator, Surge, and Antler, IIMA’s academic rigor and regional incubation network stand out, though its smaller funding size is a limitation. Led by Priyanka Agarwal Chopra, IIMA plans to invest in 40-50 startups in 2025 via a ₹40 crore fund with SIDBI. This essay explores IIMA Ventures’ journey, impact, comparisons, and future, highlighting its role in fostering India’s $1 trillion startup economy by 2030 . Essay: IIMA V...
Read more

India’s Ethanol Revolution

Image
India’s Ethanol Revolution: Fueling Energy, Farming, and the Future (2018–2030) Over the past seven years, India’s Ethanol Blending Programme (EBP) has transformed from a modest initiative into a cornerstone of energy and agricultural policy. Ethanol production has soared from 1,880 million liters in 2018–19 to 10,000 million liters in 2024–25, achieving 20% petrol blending (E20) ahead of schedule. The feedstock mix has shifted dramatically, with grain-based ethanol, especially maize, now equaling sugarcane’s share, driven by water concerns and policy incentives. This has saved $12.8 billion in crude oil imports (2014–2022) and boosted farmer incomes by ₹87,558 crore. However, rising maize and sugar prices, water stress, and food security concerns pose challenges. By 2030, India aims for 30% blending (E30), requiring 15,000 million liters, with a focus on second-generation (2G) ethanol. Balancing food and fuel demands will need innovative policies, as the program reshapes India’s ene...
Read more