Performing Arts of India, Japan, China, and Southeast Asia Compared to Western Ballet and Opera

Performing Arts of India, Japan, China, and Southeast Asia Compared to Western Ballet and Opera

 

This piece examines the performing arts of India, Japan, China, and Southeast Asia, identifying equivalents to Western ballet and opera while delving into the historical, cultural, and social factors that shaped their distinct trajectories. In India, classical forms like Bharatanatyam and folk traditions like Yakshagana parallel ballet and opera, rooted in spiritual traditions and decentralized patronage. Japan’s Noh, Kabuki, and Bugaku reflect Zen-inspired restraint and feudal centralization, while China’s Beijing and Kunqu operas emphasize imperial spectacle and martial artistry. Southeast Asia’s Khmer dance, Thai Khon, and Indonesian Wayang Kulit blend Indian, Chinese, and local influences, shaped by courtly patronage and colonial histories. Differences arise from India’s regional diversity and colonial disruptions, Japan’s insularity, China’s centralized governance, and Southeast Asia’s cultural hybridity. This note highlights how these vibrant traditions evolved, offering profound insights into global performing arts.

Indian Performing Arts: Equivalents to Ballet and Opera

The assumption that Indian traditions lack equivalents to Western ballet and opera often arises from a Eurocentric lens that overlooks the depth and complexity of India’s performing arts. These traditions, deeply embedded in cultural, spiritual, and social contexts, serve analogous functions to ballet’s choreographic elegance and opera’s theatrical narrative, though their forms and purposes reflect India’s unique historical trajectory.

• Ballet Equivalent: Bharatanatyam and Other Classical Dances
• Bharatanatyam, originating in Tamil Nadu’s temples, is a pinnacle of Indian classical dance, combining intricate footwork (nritta), expressive gestures (nritya), and storytelling (natya) to convey Hindu mythological narratives. “Bharatanatyam’s codified movements and emotional depth mirror ballet’s disciplined artistry,” notes dance scholar Ananya Chatterjea (Chatterjea, 2004). Its training, rooted in the guru-shishya (teacher-disciple) tradition, parallels ballet’s rigorous academies, requiring years of practice to master tala (rhythm) and abhinaya (expression). Performances, often accompanied by live Carnatic music, evoke rasa (aesthetic emotion), akin to ballet’s narrative ballets like Giselle. “Bharatanatyam is not just dance but a spiritual dialogue,” says historian Kapila Vatsyayan (Vatsyayan, 1974).
• Other classical forms, including Kathak (North India), Odissi (Odisha), Kuchipudi (Andhra Pradesh), Manipuri (Manipur), Mohiniyattam (Kerala), and Sattriya (Assam), recognized by the Sangeet Natak Akademi, also align with ballet’s aesthetic and narrative qualities. Kathakali, a Kerala dance-drama, integrates elaborate makeup, costumes, and martial arts-inspired movements (drawn from kalaripayattu), resembling ballet’s theatricality. “Kathakali’s exaggerated expressions create a mythic world, much like ballet’s dramatic spectacles,” observes scholar Phillip Zarrilli (Zarrilli, 2000). These forms, performed in temples or courts, prioritize spiritual storytelling over secular entertainment, distinguishing them from ballet’s courtly origins.
• Opera Equivalent: Yakshagana, Sangeet Natak, and Folk Traditions
• Yakshagana, a Karnataka folk-theater form, blends music, dance, and improvised dialogue to enact epics like the Ramayana. “Yakshagana’s vibrant synthesis of song, movement, and narrative mirrors opera’s theatrical grandeur,” says folklorist K. S. Upadhyaya (Upadhyaya, 1996). Its use of live percussion and vocalists parallels opera’s orchestral integration. Sangeet Natak, a North Indian musical theater tradition, combines singing, instrumental music, and storytelling, often in royal courts. “Sangeet Natak’s lyrical narratives evoke opera’s emotive power,” notes theater scholar Anuradha Kapur (Kapur, 1990).
• Folk forms like Ramlila, a communal enactment of the Ramayana across North India, and devotional performances like Qawwali or Baul share opera’s focus on vocal artistry and emotional resonance. “Ramlila’s participatory storytelling creates an operatic community experience,” says scholar Richard Schechner (Schechner, 1983). Therukoothu (Tamil Nadu) and Bhavai (Gujarat) further integrate music, dance, and drama, serving as regional opera equivalents. “Therukoothu’s raw energy captures opera’s dramatic intensity,” notes folk theater expert Balwant Gargi (Gargi, 1966).
• Cultural and Philosophical Context: Indian performing arts are grounded in the Natya Shastra (c. 200 BCE–200 CE), a seminal treatise by Bharata Muni that codifies dance, music, and drama as interconnected arts aimed at evoking rasa. “The Natya Shastra is a holistic blueprint for performance as spiritual practice,” explains scholar Rustom Bharucha (Bharucha, 1990). Unlike opera’s secular spectacle or ballet’s courtly elegance, Indian arts were devotional, performed in temples or festivals to connect audiences with the divine. “Indian dance is a sacred offering, not mere entertainment,” says dancer Leela Venkataraman (Venkataraman, 2002).

Additional Major Reasons for India’s Distinct Development

Beyond the more obvious factors (decentralized patronage, regional diversity, colonial disruption, and spiritual focus), several other major reasons explain why Indian performing arts developed differently from Western ballet and opera, as well as from Japan, China, and Southeast Asia:

• Oral Tradition and Lack of Notation: Indian arts relied on oral transmission through the guru-shishya system, preserving knowledge without written notation. “The absence of standardized notation allowed regional variations but hindered universal replication,” notes musicologist Ashok Ranade (Ranade, 2006). Unlike Western ballet’s Labanotation or opera’s musical scores, Indian forms varied by guru, limiting large-scale institutionalization. This fluidity fostered creativity but prevented the centralized codification seen in China’s Beijing Opera or Japan’s Noh.
• Integration of Arts: Indian performances seamlessly blend dance, music, and drama, resisting the specialization of Western ballet (dance-focused) or opera (vocal-focused). “Indian art forms are holistic, defying Western compartmentalization,” says scholar Ananda Coomaraswamy (Coomaraswamy, 1918). This integration, rooted in the Natya Shastra, prioritized multidisciplinary expression over single-discipline virtuosity, unlike Japan’s specialized Noh or China’s acrobatic opera.
• Social Stratification and Accessibility: Indian arts were accessible across castes and communities, performed in villages, temples, or courts. “Ramlila’s communal nature democratized performance,” observes anthropologist Nita Kumar (Kumar, 1988). This contrasts with opera’s elite audiences and Japan’s urban theaters, which catered to merchants or samurai. India’s inclusive contexts reduced the need for exclusive venues, shaping smaller-scale, flexible performances.
• Economic Constraints Pre- and Post-Colonialism: Pre-colonial India’s wealth (25–30% of global GDP in the 16th–18th centuries, per Angus Maddison) supported arts, but colonial exploitation drained resources. “Colonial taxation crippled cultural patronage,” says historian Partha Chatterjee (Chatterjee, 1993). Post-independence, limited state funding prioritized preservation over grand infrastructure, unlike China’s state-backed opera houses.
• Resistance to Westernization: While Japan and China adopted Western theatrical forms (e.g., shingeki, huaju), India’s post-independence focus on cultural revival resisted Western models. “India reclaimed its traditions to assert identity,” says scholar Sunil Kothari (Kothari, 2001). This preserved classical forms but delayed modern theater development.

Japanese Performing Arts: Equivalents to Ballet and Opera

Japan’s performing arts, shaped by Shinto, Buddhist, and feudal influences, offer refined parallels to ballet and opera, emphasizing aesthetic restraint and theatricality.

• Noh Theatre (Opera Equivalent):
• Developed in the 14th century by Kan’ami and Zeami under Ashikaga shogunate patronage, Noh is a stylized dance-drama blending chant, dance, and poetic text. “Noh’s spiritual minimalism evokes opera’s emotional depth,” says scholar Thomas Hare (Hare, 1986). Its chanting, derived from Buddhist prayers, and instrumental ensemble (drums, flute, lute) mirror opera’s vocal-orchestral synthesis. “Noh’s slow movements are a meditative ballet,” notes dancer Monica Bethe (Bethe, 1992).
• Kabuki (Opera and Ballet Equivalent):
• Emerging in the 17th century, Kabuki features exaggerated acting, vibrant costumes, and music (shamisen, drums). “Kabuki’s theatrical spectacle rivals opera’s grandeur,” says scholar Samuel Leiter (Leiter, 2002). Its dance sequences (buyō) parallel ballet’s choreography, with martial arts-inspired poses. “Kabuki’s dynamic physicality is a choreographic cousin to ballet,” observes historian Gunji Masakatsu (Gunji, 1985).
• Bugaku (Ballet Equivalent):
• A Heian-period (8th century) court dance, Bugaku features stately group choreography influenced by Chinese and Indian forms. “Bugaku’s ritualistic precision mirrors ballet’s disciplined elegance,” says musicologist William Malm (Malm, 2000). Performed at imperial courts, it emphasizes aesthetic harmony over narrative.
• Bunraku (Opera Equivalent):
• This 17th-century puppet theater combines narrated storytelling (tayū), shamisen music, and intricate puppets. “Bunraku’s emotional intensity is operatic,” says scholar Barbara Adachi (Adachi, 1985). The chanter’s vocal delivery parallels an operatic aria.
• Cultural Context: Japan’s arts reflect wabi-sabi (aesthetic simplicity) and Zen Buddhist principles. “Noh’s restraint embodies Zen’s focus on essence,” says philosopher Yasuo Yuasa (Yuasa, 1987). Japan’s selective borrowing from China (via Korea) and later isolation (sakoku, 1635–1853) fostered unique forms, unlike India’s diverse influences.

Factors Shaping Japanese Performing Arts

• Centralized Feudal Patronage: The imperial court and Tokugawa shogunate funded Noh and Bugaku, while Edo-period merchants supported Kabuki theaters. “Japan’s feudal stability enabled consistent arts patronage,” says historian Andrew Gerstle (Gerstle, 2003).
• Urbanization and Commercialization: Edo (Tokyo) theaters catered to urban audiences, unlike India’s temple-based performances. “Kabuki’s commercial success reflects Japan’s urban growth,” notes scholar James Brandon (Brandon, 1992).
• Cultural Isolation: Sakoku preserved indigenous forms. “Isolation refined Noh’s aesthetic purity,” says scholar Karen Brazell (Brazell, 1998).
• Meiji Westernization: Post-1868, Japan balanced traditional arts with Western realism (shingeki). “Meiji reforms integrated opera while preserving Kabuki,” observes historian Donald Shively (Shively, 1978).
• Aesthetic Philosophy: Japan’s emphasis on mono no aware (sensitivity to ephemerality) shaped restrained forms. “Noh’s subtlety reflects Japan’s transient worldview,” says scholar Donald Keene (Keene, 1966).

Chinese Performing Arts: Equivalents to Ballet and Opera

China’s performing arts, influenced by Confucianism, Buddhism, and imperial patronage, emphasize spectacle and narrative, aligning closely with opera.

• Beijing Opera (Jingju, Opera Equivalent):
• A 19th-century Qing dynasty form, Beijing Opera integrates singing, acrobatics, martial arts, and stylized dance. “Beijing Opera’s vocal virtuosity and spectacle mirror Western opera,” says scholar Nancy Guy (Guy, 2005). Its painted faces and martial movements (wushu) add a ballet-like physicality. “Jingju’s choreography is a dynamic parallel to ballet,” notes theater expert Elizabeth Wichmann (Wichmann, 1991).
• Kunqu Opera (Opera Equivalent):
• Originating in the 16th century, Kunqu features lyrical singing and poetic narratives, often from works like The Peony Pavilion. “Kunqu’s literary elegance rivals opera’s narrative depth,” says musicologist Bell Yung (Yung, 1989).
• Tang Court Dances (Ballet Equivalent):
• Tang dynasty (618–907 CE) dances used large ensembles and Central Asian influences. “Tang dances share ballet’s ritualistic grandeur,” says historian Charles Holcombe (Holcombe, 1994).
• Shadow Puppet Theatre (Opera Equivalent):
• Dating to the Han dynasty, it blends narration and music. “Shadow puppets evoke opera’s storytelling through visual music,” says scholar Fan Pen Chen (Chen, 2003).
• Cultural Context: Confucianism emphasized moral narratives, while martial arts added physicality. “Beijing Opera’s acrobatics reflect China’s martial tradition,” says scholar Colin Mackerras (Mackerras, 1997). Secular entertainment balanced ritualistic origins, unlike India’s devotional focus.

Factors Shaping Chinese Performing Arts

• Imperial Patronage: Tang, Song, and Ming dynasties funded large-scale performances and training schools. “Imperial support built China’s theatrical infrastructure,” says historian Patricia Ebrey (Ebrey, 1996).
• Urban Theater Districts: Song dynasty (960–1279) urban centers supported professional troupes. “Urbanization fostered Beijing Opera’s commercial growth,” notes scholar Joshua Goldstein (Goldstein, 2007).
• Communist Standardization: Post-1949, Beijing Opera was promoted as a national symbol. “Maoist policies unified Chinese opera,” says scholar Xiaomei Chen (Chen, 2002).
• Martial Arts Influence: Wushu shaped opera’s physicality. “Acrobatics distinguish Chinese opera from Western forms,” observes theater historian Wang-Ngai Siu (Siu, 1997).
• Western Influence: 19th-century huaju (spoken drama) adopted Western realism. “Huaju reflects China’s selective Westernization,” says scholar Chen Xiaomei (Chen, 2002).

Southeast Asian Performing Arts: Development and Equivalents

Southeast Asia’s performing arts, shaped by Indian, Chinese, Islamic, and indigenous influences, reflect a cultural crossroads, blending courtly and folk traditions.

• Cambodia (Khmer Classical Dance):
• Rooted in the Angkor period (9th–13th centuries), Khmer dance enacts Ramayana with apsara-inspired movements and pinpeat music. “Khmer dance’s sculptural grace parallels ballet’s elegance,” says scholar Toni Shapiro-Phim (Shapiro-Phim, 2002). Its courtly origins mirror ballet’s royal patronage.
• Thailand (Khon and Lakhon):
• Khon, a masked dance-drama, and Lakhon, a narrative dance, enact Ramayana with gamelan-like music. “Khon’s martial choreography mirrors ballet’s structure,” notes scholar Mattani Rutnin (Rutnin, 1993). Lakhon’s grace aligns with ballet’s lyrical quality.
• Indonesia (Wayang Kulit and Topeng):
• Wayang Kulit (shadow puppets) and Topeng (masked dance) blend Hindu and Islamic narratives with gamelan music. “Wayang Kulit’s narrative music is operatic in scope,” says ethnomusicologist Sumarsam (Sumarsam, 1995).
• Vietnam (Hat Cheo and Cai Luong):
• Hat Cheo (folk opera) and Cai Luong (20th-century musical drama) use traditional melodies and Western elements. “Cai Luong’s hybridity reflects opera’s emotional range,” says scholar Jason Gibbs (Gibbs, 2004).
• Development Factors:
• Indian Influence: Trade (1st century CE) introduced Hindu epics, adapted to animistic beliefs. “Indianization shaped Southeast Asia’s narrative arts,” says historian George Coedès (Coedès, 1968).
• Court Patronage: Khmer, Thai, and Javanese courts formalized dance-drama. “Royal patronage created refined forms,” notes scholar Brandon Sewall (Sewall, 1983).
• Islamic Influence: In Indonesia, Islam enriched narratives. “Islamic themes expanded Wayang’s scope,” says scholar Laurie Sears (Sears, 1996).
• Colonial Impact: European rule (16th–20th centuries) disrupted patronage, but post-independence revivals restored arts. “Colonialism challenged Khmer dance’s continuity,” says scholar Catherine Diamond (Diamond, 2012).
• Animistic Roots: Indigenous rituals shaped folk forms. “Southeast Asia’s dances blend animism with imported epics,” notes scholar Barbara Hatley (Hatley, 2008).

Comparative Analysis: Factors Shaping Distinct Development

• Cultural and Philosophical Foundations:
• India: The Natya Shastra’s spiritual framework prioritized rasa and devotion. “Indian arts are sacred journeys to divine connection,” says scholar Ananda Coomaraswamy (Coomaraswamy, 1918). This contrasts with opera’s secular spectacle.
• China: Confucianism and Buddhism balanced moral and entertainment goals. “Chinese opera reflects social harmony and imperial ideals,” says scholar Wang-Ngai Siu (Siu, 1997).
• Japan: Shinto and Zen aesthetics emphasized restraint. “Noh’s minimalism is a Zen meditation on transience,” says scholar Donald Keene (Keene, 1966).
• Southeast Asia: Hybridity blended Indian, Chinese, and animistic elements. “Southeast Asia’s arts are a cultural synthesis,” says scholar Barbara Hatley (Hatley, 2008).
• Patronage Systems:
• India’s decentralized temples and courts contrasted with China’s imperial and Japan’s feudal systems. “India’s pluralism hindered unified patronage,” says historian Romila Thapar (Thapar, 2002).
• Southeast Asia’s courts supported localized forms. “Thai courts formalized Khon as a national art,” says scholar Pornrat Damrhung (Damrhung, 2007).
• Political Stability:
• India’s invasions and colonial rule disrupted continuity, unlike China’s dynastic cycles and Japan’s isolation. “Japan’s sakoku preserved cultural purity,” says historian Marius Jansen (Jansen, 2000).
• Southeast Asia’s colonial disruptions were offset by post-independence revivals. “Cambodia’s dance revival reflects national identity,” says scholar Sam-Ang Sam (Sam, 1999).
• Western Influence:
• India resisted Westernization to preserve traditions, while China and Japan adopted realism (huaju, shingeki). “Japan’s Meiji era balanced tradition and innovation,” says scholar Carol Sorgenfrei (Sorgenfrei, 2005).
• Southeast Asia integrated Western elements post-colonially. “Cai Luong’s Western influence reflects Vietnam’s hybridity,” says scholar Philip Taylor (Taylor, 2001).
• Physicality and Martial Arts:
• India’s kalaripayattu influenced Kathakali but prioritized symbolism. “Kathakali’s martial roots serve spiritual ends,” says scholar Phillip Zarrilli (Zarrilli, 2000).
• China’s wushu shaped opera’s acrobatics. “Beijing Opera’s physicality is a martial spectacle,” says scholar Nancy Guy (Guy, 2005).
• Japan’s martial arts informed Kabuki’s dynamism. “Kabuki’s poses reflect samurai aesthetics,” says scholar Gunji Masakatsu (Gunji, 1985).
• Southeast Asia’s dances incorporated martial elements (e.g., Thai Khon). “Khon’s combat scenes echo ballet’s athleticism,” says scholar Mattani Rutnin (Rutnin, 1993).

Fusion Experiments Between Indian and Western Performing Arts in the Modern Era   The modern era has witnessed vibrant fusion experiments blending Indian performing arts with Western ballet, opera, and contemporary forms, driven by globalization, diaspora communities, and artistic innovation. These collaborations create new expressions while preserving traditional roots. Chandralekha’s Choreographic Innovations Pioneering choreographer Chandralekha (1928–2006) blended Bharatanatyam with contemporary dance and kalaripayattu. Her works, such as Angika (1985) and Lilavati (1990), integrated Bharatanatyam’s precision with modern dance’s abstraction, resembling contemporary ballet. “Chandralekha’s fusion redefined Indian dance as global art,” notes Uttara Coorlawala (1994). Astad Deboo’s Contemporary Dance Astad Deboo (1947–2020) fused Kathak with contemporary dance, collaborating with Pina Bausch’s Tanztheater. Breaking Boundaries (2000) blended Kathak’s spins with modern fluidity, creating ballet-like spectacles. “Deboo’s work bridges Kathak with Western abstraction,” says Ashish Khokar (2003). Nrityagram Dance Ensemble Founded by Protima Gauri Bedi, Nrityagram blends Odissi with contemporary dance. Sacred Space (1990s) integrates Odissi’s grace with modern spatial dynamics, performed globally. “Nrityagram creates a universal dance language,” says Ananya Chatterjea (2004). Bollywood and Operatic Elements Bollywood films like Mughal-e-Azam (1960) blend Kathak-inspired dance with orchestral scores, echoing opera. “Bollywood’s song-dance sequences echo opera’s spectacle,” notes Rachel Dwyer (2000). Choreographers like Shiamak Davar fuse Bollywood with jazz and ballet. Rabindranath Tagore’s Dance-Dramas Tagore’s Chitrangada (1936) blended Indian dance with Western realism. “Tagore bridges rasa with narrative clarity,” says Santosh Chakrabarti (1980). Global Collaborations Mallika Sarabhai integrated Bharatanatyam into operas like The Magic Flute. “Sarabhai brings Indian expressivity to opera,” notes Leela Venkataraman (2002). Ananda Shankar’s fusion with rock parallels experimental opera. Factors Driving Fusion Globalization: Post-1947 cultural exchange facilitated collaborations. “Globalization opened Indian dance to Western stages,” says Pallabi Chakravorty (2008). Diaspora Influence: Diaspora artists like Akram Khan blend Kathak with ballet. “Diaspora fosters hybrid forms,” says Sanjoy Roy (2010). Institutional Support: Kalakshetra and festivals promote fusion. “Kalakshetra bridges East and West,” says Avanthi Meduri (1996). Technology: Digital platforms enable cross-cultural choreography. “Online collaborations redefine fusion,” says Priya Srinivasan (2012).

 

Reflection

The performing arts of India, Japan, China, and Southeast Asia weave a rich narrative of cultural resilience and diversity, each shaped by unique historical, philosophical, and social forces. India’s Bharatanatyam and Yakshagana, steeped in Hindu spirituality, reflect a decentralized, devotional ethos, contrasting with Japan’s Noh and Kabuki, which embody Zen restraint and feudal patronage. China’s Beijing Opera, with its martial spectacle, highlights imperial centralization, while Southeast Asia’s Khmer dance and Wayang Kulit showcase hybridity from Indian, Chinese, and indigenous roots.

“Indian dance is a temple art, evoking divine connection,” notes Kapila Vatsyayan (Vatsyayan, 1974), while Colin Mackerras observes, “Beijing Opera became China’s cultural ambassador” (Mackerras, 1997). Southeast Asia’s arts, as Toni Shapiro-Phim highlights, reflect national identity through post-colonial revival (Shapiro-Phim, 2002).

India’s regional diversity and colonial disruptions fostered fluid, community-based forms, unlike Japan’s insular refinement or China’s urban theaters. Southeast Asia’s hybrid traditions underscore its role as a cultural crossroads. The absence of grand theaters in India reflects a preference for sacred, flexible spaces, not a lack of sophistication. Japan’s isolation preserved Noh’s purity, while China’s dynastic stability elevated opera’s grandeur. Southeast Asia’s resilience against colonial suppression underscores its adaptability.

This analysis reveals that Asian arts, far from lacking equivalents to ballet and opera, offer profound parallels shaped by local priorities. Future exploration could examine how globalization blends these traditions with modern forms, preserving their essence while fostering cross-cultural dialogues, ensuring their vibrancy in an interconnected world.

 

References

1. Adachi, B. (1985). Backstage at Bunraku. Weatherhill.
2. Bethe, M. (1992). Noh Performance Guides. Cornell East Asia Series.
3. Bharucha, R. (1990). Theatre and the World. Routledge.
4. Brandon, J. R. (1992). Kabuki: Five Classic Plays. Harvard University Press.
5. Brazell, K. (1998). Traditional Japanese Theater. Columbia University Press.
6. Chatterjea, A. (2004). Butting Out: Reading Resistive Choreographies. Wesleyan University Press.
7. Chatterjee, P. (1993). The Nation and Its Fragments. Princeton University Press.
8. Chen, F. P. (2003). Chinese Shadow Theatre. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
9. Chen, X. (2002). Acting the Right Part. University of Hawaii Press.
10. Coedès, G. (1968). The Indianized States of Southeast Asia. University of Hawaii Press.
11. Coomaraswamy, A. (1918). The Dance of Shiva. Sunwise Turn.
12. Damrhung, P. (2007). Dance, Drama, and Theatre in Thailand. Silkworm Books.
13. Diamond, C. (2012). Communities of Imagination. University of Hawaii Press.
14. Ebrey, P. (1996). The Cambridge Illustrated History of China. Cambridge University Press.
15. Gargi, B. (1966). Folk Theater of India. University of Washington Press.
16. Gerstle, A. (2003). Chikamatsu: Five Late Plays. Columbia University Press.
17. Gibbs, J. (2004). Vietnamese Traditional Music. Asian Music Journal.
18. Goldstein, J. (2007). Drama Kings. University of California Press.
19. Guy, N. (2005). Peking Opera and Politics in Taiwan. University of Illinois Press.
20. Hare, T. (1986). Zeami’s Style. Stanford University Press.
21. Hatley, B. (2008). Javanese Performances. University of Hawaii Press.
22. Holcombe, C. (1994). The Genesis of East Asia. University of Hawaii Press.
23. Jansen, M. (2000). The Making of Modern Japan. Harvard University Press.
24. Kapur, A. (1990). Actors, Pilgrims, Kings and Gods. Seagull Books.
25. Keene, D. (1966). Noh: The Classical Theatre of Japan. Kodansha.
26. Kothari, S. (2001). Bharatanatyam. Marg Publications.
27. Kumar, N. (1988). The Artisans of Banaras. Princeton University Press.
28. Leiter, S. (2002). New Kabuki Encyclopedia. Greenwood Press.
29. Mackerras, C. (1997). Peking Opera. Oxford University Press.
30. Malm, W. (2000). Traditional Japanese Music and Musical Instruments. Kodansha.
31. Meduri, A. (1996). Nation, Woman, Representation. PhD dissertation, NYU.
32. Ranade, A. (2006). Music Contexts. Bibliophile South Asia.
33. Rutnin, M. (1993). Dance, Drama, and Theatre in Thailand. Silkworm Books.
34. Sam, S.-A. (1999). Khmer Dance and Music. Khmer Arts Academy.
35. Schechner, R. (1983). Performative Circumstances. Seagull Books.
36. Sears, L. (1996). Shadows of Empire. Duke University Press.
37. Shapiro-Phim, T. (2002). Dance in Cambodia. Cornell University Press.
38. Shively, D. (1978). The Social History of Kabuki. Harvard University Press.
39. Siu, W.-N. (1997). Chinese Opera. Hong Kong University Press.
40. Sorgenfrei, C. (2005). Unspeakable Acts. University of Hawaii Press.
41. Sumarsam. (1995). Gamelan. University of Chicago Press.
42. Taylor, P. (2001). Fragments of the Past. University of Hawaii Press.
43. Thapar, R. (2002). Early India. Penguin Books.
44. Upadhyaya, K. S. (1996). Folk Theatre of Karnataka. Karnataka University Press.
45. Vatsyayan, K. (1974). Indian Classical Dance. Sangeet Natak Akademi.
46. Venkataraman, L. (2002). Indian Classical Dance. Roli Books.
47. Wichmann, E. (1991). Acting and Ideology in Chinese Opera. University of Michigan Press.
48. Yung, B. (1989). Cantonese Opera. Cambridge University Press.
49. Yuasa, Y. (1987). The Body: Toward an Eastern Mind-Body Theory. SUNY Press.
50. Zarrilli, P. (2000). Kathakali Dance-Drama. Routledge.